[CGA-EXT] Comments on draft-ietf-csi-proxy-send-01

Tony Cheneau <tony.cheneau@it-sudparis.eu> Thu, 19 November 2009 10:54 UTC

Return-Path: <tony.cheneau@it-sudparis.eu>
X-Original-To: cga-ext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cga-ext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB1683A6A7D for <cga-ext@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:54:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PdAtMZNhkXSW for <cga-ext@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:54:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp4.int-evry.fr (smtp4.int-evry.fr [157.159.10.71]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41E93A68EE for <cga-ext@ietf.org>; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:54:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp2.int-evry.fr (smtp2.int-evry.fr [157.159.10.45]) by smtp4.int-evry.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B926FFE1B6C; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:54:42 +0100 (CET)
Received: from smtp-ext.int-evry.fr (smtp-ext.int-evry.fr [157.159.11.17]) by smtp2.int-evry.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A8E640565A; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:54:36 +0100 (CET)
Received: from pat4661.micro.int-evry.fr (unknown [157.159.103.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-ext.int-evry.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE152900E4; Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:54:35 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:54:48 +0100 (CET)
From: Tony Cheneau <tony.cheneau@it-sudparis.eu>
X-X-Sender: shad@whitebox
To: draft-ietf-csi-proxy-send@tools.ietf.org
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.0911191100150.7833@whitebox>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
X-INT-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-INT-MailScanner-ID: 0A8E640565A.ACB72
X-INT-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-INT-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.399, requis 6.01, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -2.60)
X-INT-MailScanner-From: tony.cheneau@it-sudparis.eu
Cc: cga-ext@ietf.org
Subject: [CGA-EXT] Comments on draft-ietf-csi-proxy-send-01
X-BeenThere: cga-ext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: CGA and SeND Extensions <cga-ext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext>, <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cga-ext>
List-Post: <mailto:cga-ext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext>, <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2009 10:54:46 -0000

Hello,

I reviewed draft-ietf-csi-proxy-send-01 and have the following
comments/remarks:

- In section 4.1, "figure 1: Proxy ND operations", in the first message,
   I think the "SLLAO = B_LL" should be "SLLAO = A_LL"

- Small typo in section 6,  "(PSO.)" should be "(PSO)."

- I have a concern about the content of the Security Considerations
   (Section 8).
   It would be nice to have a warning text such as: "Note that if a Secure
   Proxy ND is corrupted, it can impersonate all the node in the subnet
   in which it is authorized to act as a proxy."

- The section 10 (normative references) contains a reference to
   [I-D.ietf-netlmm-proxymip6] that is now RFC 5213

As you can see, I have only minor comments. The document is in a good
shape.

Hope it helps.

Regards,
 	Tony Cheneau