[CGA-EXT] IPR declaration for draft-ietf-csi-sndp-prob
Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net> Thu, 03 December 2009 16:00 UTC
Return-Path: <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
X-Original-To: cga-ext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cga-ext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id CEC8928C17F for <cga-ext@core3.amsl.com>;
Thu, 3 Dec 2009 08:00:12 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.515
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.515 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.084,
BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OEQPQhg221xI for
<cga-ext@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 08:00:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from p130.piuha.net (p130.piuha.net [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by
core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60B5E28C183 for <cga-ext@ietf.org>;
Thu, 3 Dec 2009 08:00:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by p130.piuha.net (Postfix)
with ESMTP id E1CF0D4963 for <cga-ext@ietf.org>;
Thu, 3 Dec 2009 18:00:02 +0200 (EET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at piuha.net
Received: from p130.piuha.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (p130.piuha.net
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tTMAxVKSCxqI for
<cga-ext@ietf.org>; Thu, 3 Dec 2009 18:00:02 +0200 (EET)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown [IPv6:2001:14b8:400::130]) by
p130.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E577D491E for <cga-ext@ietf.org>;
Thu, 3 Dec 2009 18:00:02 +0200 (EET)
Message-ID: <4B17E081.6000206@piuha.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 18:00:01 +0200
From: Jari Arkko <jari.arkko@piuha.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cga-ext@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [CGA-EXT] IPR declaration for draft-ietf-csi-sndp-prob
X-BeenThere: cga-ext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: CGA and SeND Extensions <cga-ext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext>,
<mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cga-ext>
List-Post: <mailto:cga-ext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext>,
<mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:00:12 -0000
Folks, This is a heads-up that Ericsson has filed an IPR declaration to the IETF on this document. I realize this is a problem definition document, not a specification. But the document does have a section that surveys a number of different solutions, and I have personal knowledge that some of those may have Ericsson IPR on them. The IPR declaration will appear in the database as soon as the secretariat processes it, but it says that if the working group eventually develops some specification employing those solutions, then the licensing conditions that hold for RFC 3971 would also hold for such extensions. Those conditions are in legal terms "non-assert", i.e., in my layman's understanding employ the you-dont-sue-us-we-dont-sue-you model. I am embarrassed that we are making this declaration so late, and its my fault. I have looked at this document before, but I only read it fully now that its up for IESG review. In particular, I had not looked at the section that discusses a number of possible solutions. In my defense I was already earlier tracking the solution document (draft-ietf-csi-send-proxy) and to my personal knowledge it has no IPR issues; the additional material in the problem definition draft took me by surprise. Jari