Re: [CGA-EXT] a question about draft-ietf-csi-sndp-prob-01

Jean-Michel Combes <jeanmichel.combes@gmail.com> Sun, 18 October 2009 14:01 UTC

Return-Path: <jeanmichel.combes@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: cga-ext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cga-ext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DA1A3A694F for <cga-ext@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 07:01:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ct1LrFRe7puc for <cga-ext@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 07:01:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iw0-f186.google.com (mail-iw0-f186.google.com [209.85.223.186]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57CD33A6832 for <cga-ext@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 07:01:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iwn16 with SMTP id 16so1954557iwn.29 for <cga-ext@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 07:01:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=99RlDPftG4ZrWEbwiDqgvncFSjYs3IWYaNZjK62GUio=; b=wBRcExuM4MEyFJEZEt/Ez2aTC5AxgihqprQ423XUAmL6Lch2nqKFCPcjtry7YUZ6Wz TCu6ZRzI40by8xz/D8R0SPMGpzC1HFN7zwxIbFgbjNgl7x5ket3UNmpK8OCgH6ax1EYk Yhl7CH2VtjMvl5/3YuUfuGKxqTZoYH2/BVa0I=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=DFLir9Jv+yEeSpudW68RkDfUbZZgf8vQ7vz7Kf5wgXqKbH+jmSqZ09s4Nz01NGzTcS 8zpYNbOPcC5OonRGZghLMxU7lkSVHXBTBBn6HCw0eS9neiYK4nKBt17cKJd82iCEjBWF qMNOsruF7xgBdXuVujZ6cRYA2nPesW6/uFyc4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.122.139 with SMTP id l11mr5004859ibr.53.1255874510735; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 07:01:50 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4AB34C9E.1070603@it.uc3m.es>
References: <4AB34C9E.1070603@it.uc3m.es>
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 16:01:50 +0200
Message-ID: <729b68be0910180701t79e615a5ibdc251253c6dcb13@mail.gmail.com>
From: Jean-Michel Combes <jeanmichel.combes@gmail.com>
To: marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "cga-ext@ietf.org" <cga-ext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [CGA-EXT] a question about draft-ietf-csi-sndp-prob-01
X-BeenThere: cga-ext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: CGA and SeND Extensions <cga-ext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext>, <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cga-ext>
List-Post: <mailto:cga-ext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext>, <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:01:49 -0000

Hi Marcelo,

thanks for the review.

2009/9/18 marcelo bagnulo braun <marcelo@it.uc3m.es>es>:
> Hi,
>
> I am reviewing draft-ietf-csi-sndp-prob-01 to make the Shepherd write-up.
> I think the document is in good shape, but I have a question about the
> strcuture of the document. The current document has section  2.1.  IPv6
> Mobile Nodes and Neighbor Discovery Proxy and then section 2.4.  Proxy ND
> and Mobility. I fail to see why these two are separated, since they both
> describe scenarios involving MIP and SEND. Wouldn't make more sense to
> combine these two and have a single section that describes the MIP related
> scenarios?

Finally, we have removed the section 2.4 because:
- the first part of this section, as you said, is already described in
the section 2.1
- the second part of this section described mobility issues and not
security issues.

Best regards.

JMC.

>
> Regards, marcelo
>
>
>
>
>
>