[CGA-EXT] Typos in draft-ietf-csi-hash-threat-10 + little comment

Tony Cheneau <tony.cheneau@it-sudparis.eu> Tue, 20 July 2010 09:59 UTC

Return-Path: <tony.cheneau@it-sudparis.eu>
X-Original-To: cga-ext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cga-ext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C10833A69F3 for <cga-ext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 02:59:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.76
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.76 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mukhj0L8m8Yk for <cga-ext@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 02:59:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp4.int-evry.fr (smtp4.int-evry.fr []) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD09D3A694C for <cga-ext@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 02:59:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp2.int-evry.fr (smtp2.int-evry.fr []) by smtp4.int-evry.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC5AFE3DDD; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:00:11 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp-ext.int-evry.fr (smtp-ext.int-evry.fr []) by smtp2.int-evry.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DDE6404FC0; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:51:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mouette.int-evry.fr (mouette.int-evry.fr []) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-ext.int-evry.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FF552C1887B; Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:00:07 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 11:59:51 +0200 (CEST)
From: Tony Cheneau <tony.cheneau@it-sudparis.eu>
X-X-Sender: shad@whitebox
To: draft-ietf-csi-hash-threat@tools.ietf.org
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1007201133190.10324@whitebox>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
X-INT-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-INT-MailScanner-ID: 4DDE6404FC0.A9217
X-INT-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-INT-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-4.399, requis 6.01, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.80, BAYES_00 -2.60)
X-INT-MailScanner-From: tony.cheneau@it-sudparis.eu
Cc: cga-ext@ietf.org
Subject: [CGA-EXT] Typos in draft-ietf-csi-hash-threat-10 + little comment
X-BeenThere: cga-ext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: CGA and SeND Extensions <cga-ext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext>, <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cga-ext>
List-Post: <mailto:cga-ext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext>, <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:59:57 -0000

Hello Ana, Suresh and Sheng,

I read your document and noted the following typos:

Section 3:
theaforementioned => the aforementioned

Section 5:
"the attacks against hash functions hash attacks" => "the attacks
against hash functions"

Also, I see that section 4 from the -09 version has been removed ("Support 
for the hash agility in SEND"). I read the IESG evaluation record and I 
fail to see why this part was removed. Could you detail this decision ? 
IMHO, this section was especially important because RFC 4982 only 
describes CGA related issues and not SEND issues.