Re: [CGA-EXT] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps-02

Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com> Sat, 24 April 2010 18:20 UTC

Return-Path: <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>
X-Original-To: cga-ext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cga-ext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F9963A6A8A for <cga-ext@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:20:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.954
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.954 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, RCVD_IN_SORBS_WEB=0.619]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tGPUTbAwLqid for <cga-ext@core3.amsl.com>; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:20:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from web111411.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (web111411.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [67.195.15.192]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id DA67C3A6A77 for <cga-ext@ietf.org>; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 73211 invoked by uid 60001); 24 Apr 2010 18:19:50 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1272133190; bh=AEwdYRRtfctd7Klj0CiN6YXfc5qBkiOPQtl4mNefYYo=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=TGr5IvTnwl9/QJK5BX3pXz5GLYnvKyyKlSLz3hyks8nhjg/MccUxgo2OQBv6NxWjYFFZsAnQtmjpOn0xp83YnxvmOro0KhXifTWDfdiJokQj5JvluutRmxF2B++ynrMFTTKU2joFcPBsy50oIi6htmTZ2CzFHr+rXRMHu16MMSw=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=V19NlhDccIzi9tM1iFMOlKskkqRcIAYo9ewtAZ4beaIbxIBcag+qryEhaHL+QYB2/aRhmSqWCA4sLtrPCHbx9BQUqnT/P53+sp9S4satqs0Hi/KxkvhNKWatUTtACPFJShEOn0Rcq9Fr43ZsZVDcKSDDJQbJHlpA+bDL9ol0p28=;
Message-ID: <696474.56992.qm@web111411.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: Rg3NzlYVM1nq4_JIH3VzQF7JFm6n6UdZMF_.geyEYWYOmjMLkoHFbTgDYjfx1UC7XeECjyFVwu6Wj4FNWGP0Cf2bQFUmn5OZM5boEIiAFFVvYPMMADpC.Na9KGX52dU3r6oP91lRIWq0iMg2BrqCigQRlYWAVY9BDOB1acZRXJO2HLcCQnFmhsZYUB.qIjNe2rkBcL1rlvof3RmDj3F8hqI2jQ1wrInJGy1AeY5ZHiQaXhZkoluV6u8U7c65cfc0GNrXCmAaOq4T_pijrf.V.Q64H5SZGXs.NNeci.qWeYrMstn5Q5Pd2Co8TwA8ZSBZHBKsy9nN5mY1NzmY3njOtRS9O7_lE8iucpJokdXpaAM-
Received: from [77.31.231.10] by web111411.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:19:50 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/348.5 YahooMailWebService/0.8.100.260964
References: <001e01cae28a$f39df4e0$730c6f0a@china.huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 11:19:50 -0700 (PDT)
From: Behcet Sarikaya <behcetsarikaya@yahoo.com>
To: Sheng Jiang <shengjiang@huawei.com>, cga-ext@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <001e01cae28a$f39df4e0$730c6f0a@china.huawei.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: [CGA-EXT] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps-02
X-BeenThere: cga-ext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya@ieee.org>
List-Id: CGA and SeND Extensions <cga-ext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext>, <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cga-ext>
List-Post: <mailto:cga-ext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext>, <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2010 18:20:35 -0000

Hi Sheng,
  In this draft you are describing in Sections 2 and 3 a number of things DHCPv6 can do for CGA.

  It seems like there is a disconnect between CSI which has originated this PS work and DHC where the protocol work needs probably be done.

  My question is if there are any plans for a follow up requirements draft on possible solution work to be undertaken in DHC?

Regards,

Behcet



----- Original Message ----
> From: Sheng Jiang <shengjiang@huawei.com>;
> To: cga-ext@ietf.org
> Sent: Thu, April 22, 2010 9:16:15 PM
> Subject: [CGA-EXT] FW: New Version Notification for draft-ietf-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps-02
> 
> A new version has been submitted. Comments from Alberto has been addressed
in 
> this version. Further comments are 
> welcome.

Regards,

Sheng

> -----Original 
> Message-----
> From: IETF I-D Submission Tool [mailto:
> ymailto="mailto:idsubmission@ietf.org" 
> href="mailto:idsubmission@ietf.org">idsubmission@ietf.org] 
> Sent: 
> Friday, April 23, 2010 10:14 AM
> To: 
> ymailto="mailto:shengjiang@huawei.com" 
> href="mailto:shengjiang@huawei.com">shengjiang@huawei.com
> Subject: 
> New Version Notification for draft-ietf-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps-02
> 
> 
> 
> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps-02.txt has 
> 
> been successfully submitted by Sheng Jiang and posted to the 
> IETF 
> repository.
> 
> Filename:    
> draft-ietf-csi-dhcpv6-cga-ps
> Revision:     02
> 
> Title:         DHCPv6 and CGA Interaction: Problem 
> Statement
> Creation_date:     2010-04-22
> WG 
> ID:         csi
> Number_of_pages: 9
> 
> 
> Abstract:
> This document describes potential issues in the 
> interaction between
> DHCPv6 and Cryptographically Generated Addresses 
> (CGAs). 
> Firstly, the scenario of using CGAs in DHCPv6 environments is 
> 
> discussed.
> Some
> operations are clarified for the 
> interaction of DHCPv6 
> servers and CGA-associated hosts. We then also 
> discuss how 
> CGAs and DHCPv6 may have mutual benefits for each other, 
> 
> including using CGAs in DHCPv6 operations to enhance its 
> 
> security features and using DHCPv6 to provide the CGA 
> generation 
> function.
>                  
>                       
>                       
> 
>                    
> 
> 
> 
> The IETF Secretariat.
> 
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
CGA-EXT mailing 
> list

> href="mailto:CGA-EXT@ietf.org">CGA-EXT@ietf.org

> href="https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext" target=_blank 
> >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext