[CGA-EXT] New draft version (-02) for draft-cheneau-csi-send-sig-agility and draft-cheneau-csi-ecc-sig-agility

Tony Cheneau <tony.cheneau@it-sudparis.eu> Wed, 16 June 2010 16:41 UTC

Return-Path: <tony.cheneau@it-sudparis.eu>
X-Original-To: cga-ext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cga-ext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C73563A6910 for <cga-ext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 09:41:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.351
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.351 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dbiNC+MFHljA for <cga-ext@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 09:41:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp4.int-evry.fr (smtp4.int-evry.fr []) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D4043A68B9 for <cga-ext@ietf.org>; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 09:41:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp2.int-evry.fr (smtp2.int-evry.fr []) by smtp4.int-evry.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDABBFE0D99; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:41:26 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from smtp-ext.int-evry.fr (smtp-ext.int-evry.fr []) by smtp2.int-evry.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 205C240546A; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:41:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from alf94-6-82-226-232-167.fbx.proxad.net (alf94-6-82-226-232-167.fbx.proxad.net []) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-ext.int-evry.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE532C181BB; Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:41:20 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 18:42:45 +0200 (CEST)
From: Tony Cheneau <tony.cheneau@it-sudparis.eu>
X-X-Sender: shad@localhost.localdomain
To: cga-ext@ietf.org
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1006161806060.15152@localhost.localdomain>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII
X-INT-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-INT-MailScanner-ID: 205C240546A.A85B9
X-INT-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-INT-MailScanner-SpamCheck: n'est pas un polluriel, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=0.805, requis 6.01, BAYES_00 -2.60, FH_HELO_EQ_D_D_D_D 0.00, HELO_DYNAMIC_IPADDR 2.43, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL 0.88, RDNS_DYNAMIC 0.10)
X-INT-MailScanner-From: tony.cheneau@it-sudparis.eu
Cc: Sean Shen <sean.s.shen@gmail.com>, "Vanderveen, Michaela" <mvanderv@qualcomm.com>, Maryline Laurent <Maryline.Laurent@it-sudparis.eu>
Subject: [CGA-EXT] New draft version (-02) for draft-cheneau-csi-send-sig-agility and draft-cheneau-csi-ecc-sig-agility
X-BeenThere: cga-ext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: CGA and SeND Extensions <cga-ext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext>, <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cga-ext>
List-Post: <mailto:cga-ext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext>, <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2010 16:41:26 -0000

Hello CSI WG,

A new version of our set of drafts concerning SEND Signature Algorithm
Agility can be found at:

This version has been updated according Jean-Michel and Julien's review.

The changes are the following:
- Nodes do not negotiate their correspondent Signature Algorithm anymore.
   The Supported Signature Algorithm Option is now used to determine and
   diagnosis incompatibilities between nodes.
- Modification of the format of the SSAO to comply with RFC 4861
- Section 2.1 ("Potential solutions for Signature Algorithm
   Agility in SEND") has been rework for a better clarity
- Discussion of interaction with "legacy RFC 3971" nodes.

Both these drafts have been implemented in NDprotector.

Comments are welcomed.

Best regards,
 	Tony, Michaela, Maryline and Sean