[CGA-EXT] New version of draft-ietf-csi-proxy-send

Alberto García <alberto@it.uc3m.es> Thu, 04 March 2010 11:04 UTC

Return-Path: <alberto@it.uc3m.es>
X-Original-To: cga-ext@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cga-ext@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CFA83A897E for <cga-ext@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 03:04:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Oe1sl5CgYSzD for <cga-ext@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 03:04:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp02.uc3m.es (smtp02.uc3m.es [163.117.176.132]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B2553A8913 for <cga-ext@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 03:04:40 -0800 (PST)
X-uc3m-safe: yes
Received: from bombo (bombo.it.uc3m.es [163.117.139.125]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp02.uc3m.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE17E6563E2 for <cga-ext@ietf.org>; Thu, 4 Mar 2010 12:04:39 +0100 (CET)
From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Alberto_Garc=EDa?= <alberto@it.uc3m.es>
To: <cga-ext@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 12:04:41 +0100
Message-ID: <87982CEB9165479F8CCB0446D5FD844D@bombo>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
Thread-Index: Acq7idU655YhzzV5RT+I3DpX8E1HDA==
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.0.0.3116-6.0.0.1038-17162.002
Subject: [CGA-EXT] New version of draft-ietf-csi-proxy-send
X-BeenThere: cga-ext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: CGA and SeND Extensions <cga-ext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext>, <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cga-ext>
List-Post: <mailto:cga-ext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cga-ext>, <mailto:cga-ext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:04:42 -0000

Hi,
Version 02 of draft-ietf-csi-proxy-send has been submitted: see
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-csi-proxy-send-02
 
Many editorial changes have been made, in part according to address some
issues pointed by past emails in the list, being the main ones:
- The section describing the 'application scenarios' has been moved after
description of the Secure Proxy ND specification. This section has been
changed to define how Secure Proxy ND is applied to each scenario, instead
of just presenting the problems addressed.
- The 'Compatibility' section has been extended 
- The 'Security considerations' section has also been extended.

Regarding to the specification itself, some rules have been added to deal
with nonce and timestamp, and to specify the behavior when receiving
Override bit set (override always regardless if the entry it was created as
a result of a RSA Signature option or a PSO option validation). 

In emails following this one I continue past threads in the list to discuss
some other changes in the draft.

Please send your comments.

Regards,
Alberto