[CHANNEL-BINDING] registration for channel binding unique prefix "tls-unique"
Larry Zhu <lzhu@windows.microsoft.com> Wed, 11 June 2008 15:11 UTC
Return-Path: <channel-binding-bounces@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: channel-binding-archive@optimus.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ietfarch-channel-binding-archive@core3.amsl.com
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC3E33A699A; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 08:11:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Original-To: channel-binding@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: channel-binding@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B19203A6A56 for <channel-binding@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:41:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00Z3PuDi8ofS for <channel-binding@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:41:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.microsoft.com (smtp.microsoft.com [131.107.115.214]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59BA33A6943 for <channel-binding@ietf.org>; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:41:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tk1-exhub-c101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.46.185) by TK5-EXGWY-E803.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.169) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.251.2; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:41:34 -0700
Received: from tk5-exmlt-w602.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com (157.54.18.33) by tk1-exhub-c101.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.46.185) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 8.1.240.5; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:41:34 -0700
Received: from NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([fe80::8de9:51a2:cd62:f122]) by tk5-exmlt-w602.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.18.33]) with mapi; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:41:33 -0700
From: Larry Zhu <lzhu@windows.microsoft.com>
To: "channel-binding@ietf.org" <channel-binding@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 13:41:32 -0700
Thread-Topic: registration for channel binding unique prefix "tls-unique"
Thread-Index: AcjLOl2tKQQcwQ5iTrqreWGZZZ5Hkw==
Message-ID: <AB1E5627D2489D45BD01B84BD5B900460618301EEC@NA-EXMSG-W601.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 08:11:30 -0700
Cc: "iana@iana.org" <iana@iana.org>, "Nicolas.Williams@sun.com" <Nicolas.Williams@sun.com>
Subject: [CHANNEL-BINDING] registration for channel binding unique prefix "tls-unique"
X-BeenThere: channel-binding@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of channel binding IANA registry requests and specifications <channel-binding.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/channel-binding>, <mailto:channel-binding-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/pipermail/channel-binding>
List-Post: <mailto:channel-binding@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:channel-binding-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/channel-binding>, <mailto:channel-binding-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: channel-binding-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: channel-binding-bounces@ietf.org
Subject: Registration of TLS unique channel binding (generic) Channel binding unique prefix: tls-unique Channel binding type: unique Channel type: TLS Published specification: none Channel binding is secret: no Description: The client's TLS Finished messages from the first handshake of the connection (note: connection, not session, so that the channel binding is specific to each connection regardless of whether session resumption is used). Intended usage: COMMON Person and email address to contact for further information: Larry Zhu(lzhu@microsoft.com) Owner/Change controller name and email address: Larry Zhu(lzhu@microsoft.com) Expert reviewer name and contact information: Nicolas Williams (Nicolas.Williams@sun.com) Note: This channel binding construction is thought to not require confidentiality protection. We think this is so because the TLS PRF() should be resistant to key recovery attacks given that it is a simple construction based on HMAC and given the fact that the PRF key used in the Finished message computation is secret. In any event, the most common deployments of TLS always provide for session encryption, and when they don't then Finished messages are sent in clear text. Thus the fact that most authentication mechanisms that support channel binding do not send the original channel binding in clear text over the wire is not even relevant (but if it were then it would be a mitigation should it turn out that TLS Finished messages require confidentiality protection). Note: This registration was initially authored by Nicolas Williams (Nicolas.Williams@sun.com). _______________________________________________ CHANNEL-BINDING mailing list CHANNEL-BINDING@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/channel-binding