Greg Vaudreuil <gvaudre@CNRI.Reston.VA.US> Thu, 15 April 1993 19:13 UTC

Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14060; 15 Apr 93 15:13 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26834; 15 Apr 93 15:13 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14013; 15 Apr 93 15:13 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14004; 15 Apr 93 15:12 EDT
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa26782; 15 Apr 93 15:12 EDT
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13997; 15 Apr 93 15:12 EDT
To: IETF-Announce: ;
Cc: char-mib@decwrl.dec.com
Date: Thu, 15 Apr 93 15:12:23 -0400
Sender: ietf-announce-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Greg Vaudreuil <gvaudre@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Message-ID: <9304151512.aa13997@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US>

The Character MIB Working Group has been reactivated.  For more
information please contact the working group chair or the Area
Director.

Greg Vaudreuil
IESG Secretary


Character MIB (charmib)
-----------------------
 
 Charter 
 
 Chair(s):
     Bob Stewart  <rlstewart@eng.xyplex.com>
 
 Network Management Area Director(s) 
     Marshall Rose  <mrose@dbc.mtview.ca.us>
 
 Mailing lists: 
     General Discussion:char-mib@decwrl.dec.com
     To Subscribe:      char-mib-request@decwrl.dec.com
     Archive:           
 
Description of Working Group:

     The Character MIB working group is chartered to prepare a
     recommendation to the IESG evaluating RFCs 1316-1318 (the Character
     MIBs) with respect to the standards track.

     The recommendation will document implementation, interoperability,
     and deployment experience.  If this experiences suggests that
     changes should be made to the documents, new drafts may be
     prepared.  The recommendation will report one of four outcomes for
     each RFC:

	- that the RFC should be advanced from proposed to draft status,
	  without changes (if no problems are found);

	- that a draft prepared by the working group, should replace the
	  RFC, and be designated a draft standard (if only minor
	  changes are made);

	- that a draft prepared by the working group, should replace the
	  RFC, and be designated a proposed standard (if major
	  changes or feature enhancements are made); or,

	- that the RFC should be designated as historic (if this
	  technology is problematic).
 
 Goals and Milestones: 
 
   Apr 93 Reactivation of Working Group to prepare the Character MIBs for Draft
          Standard.                                                            

   Jun 93 Post an Internet Draft with the results of the survey of 
          implementation and operational experiences with the Character MIBs. 
          Post revised MIB documents if necessary.                             

   Aug 93 Submit the Character MIBs to the IESG for consideration as Draft 
          Standards.                                                           
  •   Greg Vaudreuil