IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Consensus Check - SDLC Objects for RS-232 MIB

sberl@cisco.com Thu, 03 March 1994 20:17 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09776; 3 Mar 94 15:17 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09772; 3 Mar 94 15:17 EST
Received: from large.cisco.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa15372; 3 Mar 94 15:16 EST
Received: from [198.92.30.83] (macip-dialup-37.cisco.com [198.92.30.83]) by large.cisco.com (8.6.5/8.6.5) with SMTP id LAA15443; Thu, 3 Mar 1994 11:44:18 -0800
Message-Id: <199403031944.LAA15443@large.cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 1994 11:41:57 -0800
To: Bob Stewart <rlstewart@xap.xyplex.com>, char-mib@pa.dec.com, snadlcmib@cisco.com
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: sberl@cisco.com
Subject: Re: Consensus Check - SDLC Objects for RS-232 MIB

At 10:25 AM 3/3/94 -0500, Bob Stewart wrote:
>A few people spoke in favor of adding some SDLC-related objects to the RS-232
>MIB.  They were reposted just recently by Wayne Clark, SNA SDLC MIB editor.
>They could be added as a separate compliance group for SDLC, but I didn't do
>so due to the general apathy.  The following test of consensus is intended to
>insite response.  Depending on the response, I may try the other way around.
>
>******** Consensus Test *********
>
>Are there strong objections to leaving out the proposed SDLC objects?
>
>        Bob

We will be implementing the SDLC MIB and would like to see these objects
included in the RS-232 MIB.


Steve Berl
Cisco Systems, Inc.
(415) 324-5212

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email