Re: Request for additional object values
"Jeremy A. Siegel" <jzs@nsd.3com.com> Thu, 17 December 1992 22:20 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05620;
17 Dec 92 17:20 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05616;
17 Dec 92 17:20 EST
Received: from inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02837;
17 Dec 92 17:22 EST
Received: by inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com; id AA26725; Thu, 17 Dec 92 14:22:39 -0800
Received: by nsl.pa.dec.com; id AA14757; Thu, 17 Dec 92 14:10:39 -0800
Received: by nsl.pa.dec.com; id AA14753; Thu, 17 Dec 92 14:10:38 -0800
Received: by inet-gw-2.pa.dec.com; id AA25796; Thu, 17 Dec 92 14:10:37 -0800
Received: from ktaadn.NSD.3Com.COM by bridge2.NSD.3Com.COM with SMTP id AA07981
(5.65c/IDA-1.4.4nsd for <char-mib@Pa.dec.com>); Thu, 17 Dec 1992 14:10:26 -0800
Received: by ktaadn.NSD.3Com.COM id AA09053
(5.65c/IDA-1.4.4-910725); Thu, 17 Dec 1992 14:10:25 -0800
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1992 14:10:25 -0800
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Jeremy A. Siegel" <jzs@nsd.3com.com>
Message-Id: <199212172210.AA09053@ktaadn.NSD.3Com.COM>
To: rlstewart@eng.xyplex.com
Subject: Re: Request for additional object values
Cc: char-mib@pa.dec.com
I'd second the motion to add ENQ/ACK selections to flow-control... Also another question: doesn't using an enumeration integer like that imply that the choices are mutually exclusive? Is there a "recommended" way of dealing with the possibility that both 'hardware' (CTS/RTS) and XON/XOFF flow-control could be provided simultaneously (possibly even with pacing (ENQ/ACK) as well)? --Jeremy Siegel jzs@NSD.3Com.COM
- Re: Request for additional object values Bob Stewart
- Re: Request for additional object values Jeremy A. Siegel
- Re: Request for additional object values Bob Stewart