Plans for this year?

Paul Farah <paulf@t3plus.com> Tue, 04 January 1994 18:03 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07418; 4 Jan 94 13:03 EST
Received: from CS.UTK.EDU by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07414; 4 Jan 94 13:03 EST
Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (8.6.4/2.8s-UTK) id MAA18682; Tue, 4 Jan 1994 12:39:33 -0500
X-Resent-To: chassismib@CS.UTK.EDU ; Tue, 4 Jan 1994 12:39:31 EST
Errors-to: owner-chassismib@CS.UTK.EDU
Received: from io.t3plus.com by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (8.6.4/2.8s-UTK) id MAA18674; Tue, 4 Jan 1994 12:39:28 -0500
Received: from sol.t3plus.com by io.t3plus.com with SMTP id AA24102 (5.67a/IDA-1.5 for <chassismib@cs.utk.edu>); Tue, 4 Jan 1994 09:39:55 -0800
Received: from blaze.t3plus.com by sol.t3plus.com with SMTP id AA17813 (5.67a/IDA-1.5 for <chassismib@cs.utk.edu>); Tue, 4 Jan 1994 09:43:07 -0800
Received: by blaze.t3plus.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA19670; Tue, 4 Jan 94 09:42:39 PST
Date: Tue, 4 Jan 94 09:42:39 PST
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Paul Farah <paulf@t3plus.com>
Message-Id: <9401041742.AA19670@blaze.t3plus.com>
To: chassismib@cs.utk.edu
Subject: Plans for this year?

I have a couple of questions:

1. Did anybody implement the chassis mib? 
   If so, I'd like to hear from you if you care to share your experiences.

2. What are the plans regarding the working group?  I am very interested!

> From ietf-announce-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US Mon Jul 19 18:29:19 1993
> Return-Path: <ietf-announce-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
> Sender: ietf-announce-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
> From: IESG Secretary <iesg-secretary@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
> To: IETF-Announce:;@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
> Cc: chassismib@cs.utk.edu
> Subject: WG ACTION: Chassis MIB (chassis) to Conclude
> Date: Mon, 19 Jul 1993 21:19:13 -0400
> X-Orig-Sender: jstewart@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
> Content-Length: 514
> X-Lines: 13
> Status: RO
> 
> 
> The Chassis MIB Working Group (chassis) of the IETF has concluded.
> The Working Group is over six months beyond its charter; it failed
> to meet consensus by a deadline set by the Area Director; and, the
> Network Management Area lacks the senior technical resources
> required to continue this effort.  At the beginning of 1994, a
> determination will be made to see if a new working group should be
> chartered.  The mailing list will remain active.
> 
> The IESG contact person is Marshall Rose.
> 
> John Stewart
> IESG Secretary
> 

Thanks,
Paul F.