Re: agenda for next week
Manu Kaycee <kaycee@ctron.com> Fri, 10 July 1992 23:12 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-chassismib>
Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (5.61++/2.8s-UTK) id AA21880; Fri, 10 Jul 92 19:12:42 -0400
Received: from nic.near.net by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (5.61++/2.8s-UTK) id AA21816; Fri, 10 Jul 92 19:12:05 -0400
Received: from [134.141.2.2] by nic.near.net id aa10300; 10 Jul 92 19:11 EDT
Received: from cardinals.ctron by ctron.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA03161; Fri, 10 Jul 92 19:09:35 EDT
Received: from nucleus.ctron by cardinals.ctron (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA06534; Fri, 10 Jul 92 19:10:30 EDT
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1992 19:10:30 -0400
From: Manu Kaycee <kaycee@ctron.com>
Message-Id: <9207102310.AA06534@cardinals.ctron>
To: case@cs.utk.edu, chassismib@cs.utk.edu
Subject: Re: agenda for next week
Cc: arneson@ctron.com, kaycee@ctron.com, pineau@ctron.com
> The purpose of this meeting is to try to get the Chassis MIB WG > started/restarted. > > All sorts of events have conspired to detract from efforts to get it started. > A major contributor from Cabletron got reassigned. I do, again, apologize for not being able to finish what I started. Since, the last IETF, added responsibility and work schedules have not allowed me to provide the right attention. Dave Arneson is now our chassis "guru", and main contributor. > Another major contributor and one of the cochairs has been tied up with other > standardization efforts such as (SMP). > The other cochair has been ill for nearly a month but we are pleased to hear > he is better. > Finally, the members of the [non] working group seem to think that the > mailing list is a readonly object. > > We will: > > 1. Reassess the interest in and commitment to this work and pull > the plug if appropriate (we all hope not) > > 2. Try to put together a new time-action-plan for the work. Despite our silence, and non-participation, we do firmly believe in standardizing a chassis MIB. We are committed and, as stated at the last WG meeting, are willing to share implementation experience, etc. We, Cabletron, do believe that such a MIB is required. I would suggest that we try to put together a new time-action-plan for the work. > > This may be a short meeting. There is nothing to be read or said. > > Bob and Jeff (Due to scheduling conflicts I will not be able to attend the first three days.) /Manu.
- agenda for next week case
- Re: agenda for next week Manu Kaycee