Re: agenda for next week

Manu Kaycee <kaycee@ctron.com> Fri, 10 July 1992 23:12 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-chassismib>
Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (5.61++/2.8s-UTK) id AA21880; Fri, 10 Jul 92 19:12:42 -0400
Received: from nic.near.net by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (5.61++/2.8s-UTK) id AA21816; Fri, 10 Jul 92 19:12:05 -0400
Received: from [134.141.2.2] by nic.near.net id aa10300; 10 Jul 92 19:11 EDT
Received: from cardinals.ctron by ctron.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA03161; Fri, 10 Jul 92 19:09:35 EDT
Received: from nucleus.ctron by cardinals.ctron (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA06534; Fri, 10 Jul 92 19:10:30 EDT
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 92 19:10:30 EDT
From: Manu Kaycee <kaycee@ctron.com>
Message-Id: <9207102310.AA06534@cardinals.ctron>
To: case@cs.utk.edu, chassismib@cs.utk.edu
Subject: Re: agenda for next week
Cc: arneson@ctron.com, kaycee@ctron.com, pineau@ctron.com


> The purpose of this meeting is to try to get the Chassis MIB WG
> started/restarted.
> 
> All sorts of events have conspired to detract from efforts to get it started.
> A major contributor from Cabletron got reassigned.

I do, again, apologize for not being able to finish what I started.  Since,
the last IETF, added responsibility and work schedules have not allowed me
to provide the right attention.

Dave Arneson is now our chassis "guru", and main contributor.

> Another major contributor and one of the cochairs has been tied up with other
> standardization efforts such as (SMP).
> The other cochair has been ill for nearly a month but we are pleased to hear
> he is better.
> Finally, the members of the [non] working group seem to think that the
> mailing list is a readonly object.
> 
> We will:
> 
> 	1.  Reassess the interest in and commitment to this work and pull
> 	the plug if appropriate (we all hope not)
> 
> 	2.  Try to put together a new time-action-plan for the work.

Despite our silence, and non-participation, we do firmly believe in
standardizing a chassis MIB.  We are committed and, as stated at the last
WG meeting, are willing to share implementation experience, etc.

We, Cabletron, do believe that such a MIB is required.  I would suggest
that we try to put together a new time-action-plan for the work.


> 
> This may be a short meeting.  There is nothing to be read or said.
> 
> Bob and Jeff

(Due to scheduling conflicts I will not be able to attend the first
three days.)


/Manu.