Re: Re: More comments
nob@sony.dowtyns.dk (Niels Ole Brunsgaard) Tue, 18 August 1992 18:30 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-chassismib>
Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (5.61++/2.8s-UTK) id AA03830; Tue, 18 Aug 92 14:30:42 -0400
Received: from dkuug.dk by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (5.61++/2.8s-UTK) id AA03826; Tue, 18 Aug 92 14:30:39 -0400
Received: from mips.uucp by dkuug.dk via EUnet with UUCP (5.64+/8+bit/IDA-1.2.8) id AA10753; Tue, 18 Aug 92 20:30:28 +0200
Received: from sony by dowtyns.dk (5.61/SMI-4.1) id AA15393; Tue, 18 Aug 92 20:05:13 +0200
Received: by sony.dowtyns.dk (4.0/SMI-4.1) id AA18286; Tue, 18 Aug 92 19:04:58 +0100
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 19:04:58 +0100
From: nob@sony.dowtyns.dk
Message-Id: <9208181805.AA18286@sony.dowtyns.dk>
To: chassismib@cs.utk.edu
Subject: Re: Re: More comments
X-Charset: ASCII
X-Char-Esc: 29
>> I'm surprised to hear that there can be multiple instances of MIB II >> on a per entity basis. Could someone give an example of when this might be >> the case ?. >A number of vendors have boxes which may support multiple logical >bridges, with controllers associated with a specific bridge entity >possibly spanning multiple cards. These bridge entities are purely >logical yet each is addressable with regard to management traffic. >Each entity maintains its own instance of MIB-II. >John I'm still confused. I read --> Each entity maintains its own instance of MIB-II. <-- as if there is one instance of MIB II for each entity. Should I instead read: Each logical bridge maintains its own instance of MIB-II. But in the chasEntityTable, they're all part of the same instance. Niels Ole
- More comments Niels Ole Brunsgaard
- Re: More comments John Seligson
- Re: Re: More comments Niels Ole Brunsgaard
- Re: More comments David L. Arneson (arneson@ctron.com)
- Re: More comments David L. Arneson (arneson@ctron.com)