Re: Re: More comments

nob@sony.dowtyns.dk (Niels Ole Brunsgaard) Tue, 18 August 1992 18:30 UTC

Return-Path: <owner-chassismib>
Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (5.61++/2.8s-UTK) id AA03830; Tue, 18 Aug 92 14:30:42 -0400
Received: from dkuug.dk by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (5.61++/2.8s-UTK) id AA03826; Tue, 18 Aug 92 14:30:39 -0400
Received: from mips.uucp by dkuug.dk via EUnet with UUCP (5.64+/8+bit/IDA-1.2.8) id AA10753; Tue, 18 Aug 92 20:30:28 +0200
Received: from sony by dowtyns.dk (5.61/SMI-4.1) id AA15393; Tue, 18 Aug 92 20:05:13 +0200
Received: by sony.dowtyns.dk (4.0/SMI-4.1) id AA18286; Tue, 18 Aug 92 19:04:58 +0100
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1992 19:04:58 +0100
From: nob@sony.dowtyns.dk
Message-Id: <9208181805.AA18286@sony.dowtyns.dk>
To: chassismib@cs.utk.edu
Subject: Re: Re: More comments
X-Charset: ASCII
X-Char-Esc: 29


>> I'm surprised to hear that there can be multiple instances of MIB II
>> on a per entity basis. Could someone give an example of when this might be
>> the case ?.

>A number of vendors have boxes which may support multiple logical
>bridges, with controllers associated with a specific bridge entity
>possibly spanning multiple cards.  These bridge entities are purely
>logical yet each is addressable with regard to management traffic.
>Each entity maintains its own instance of MIB-II.

>John

I'm still confused. I read

--> Each entity maintains its own instance of MIB-II. <--

as if there is one instance of MIB II for each entity. Should I
instead read: 

Each logical bridge maintains its own instance of MIB-II. But
in the chasEntityTable, they're all part of the same instance.

	Niels Ole