Re: Chassis MIB comments

[Chris Chiotasso <[e-mail]>]

Dave,

That's exactly what I am asking for.  We are developing a multi-protocol
brouter.  I will need to see each stack separately.  

Chris



> From [e-mail] Fri Jun 11 09:30:03 1993
> To: Chris Chiotasso <[e-mail]>
> Cc: [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: Chassis MIB comments 
> Date: Fri, 11 Jun 93 09:28:46 -0400
> From: "David L. Arneson" <[e-mail]>
> Content-Length: 736
> 
> Chris,
> 
> Let me make sure I understand what you are asking for.  It seems that
> you want to list the resource seperate from any of the configuration
> tables.
> 
> Second you want to make the mappings between modules/resource/entities
> as many:many:many.  Based on this understanding I would support this.
> I have felt that the relationships between resource and entities should
> be many:many.  The first thing that it would provide is the ability
> to seperate entities so that each entity can be managed seperate.  In
> other words we no longer need a brouter component we can have seperate
> bridge entity and router entity each managable in it's own right.  This
> would seem like a big win to me.  
> 
> What to others think of the idea.
> 
> /David Arneson
>