Plans for this year?
Dan Romascanu <firstname.lastname@example.org> Wed, 12 January 1994 15:18 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07148;
12 Jan 94 10:18 EST
Received: from CS.UTK.EDU by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07144; 12 Jan 94 10:18 EST
Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (8.6.4/2.8s-UTK) id JAA19808; Wed, 12 Jan 1994 09:58:52 -0500
X-Resent-To: chassismib@CS.UTK.EDU ; Wed, 12 Jan 1994 09:58:48 EST
Received: from uu4.psi.com by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (8.6.4/2.8s-UTK) id JAA19735; Wed, 12 Jan 1994 09:58:43 -0500
Received: from world.lannet.com by uu4.psi.com (5.65b/4.0.071791-PSI/PSINet) via SMTP; id AA25082 for email@example.com; Wed, 12 Jan 94 09:58:34 -0500
Received: from moon.lannet.com by gandalf.lannet.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA22336; Wed, 12 Jan 94 16:57:19 IST
Received: by moon.lannet.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA23036; Wed, 12 Jan 94 16:57:19 IST
Date: Wed, 12 Jan 94 16:57:19 IST
From: Dan Romascanu <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Subject: Plans for this year?
>1. Did anybody implement the chassis mib? > If so, I'd like to hear from you if you care to share your experiences. > We have implemented part of the initial Chassis MIB proposal in our LET-18/36/10 agents by means of variables in our private space. We do support mapping of resources relative to modules and connectivity of modules and ports to networks on the backplane. I think the initial model does not present any implementability problems if the managed box provides the means of conveying the information to the box agent. We also implemenented management of hardware resources. However, we did not yet implement any of the later refinements brought around the last meeting of the Chassis MIB in Columbus. Dan Romascanu, LANNET Data Communications Ltd., Voice: 972-3-6458-414