Re: Dense?
Bob Stewart <rlstewart@eng.xyplex.com> Wed, 16 September 1992 14:57 UTC
Return-Path: <owner-chassismib>
Received: by CS.UTK.EDU (5.61++/2.8s-UTK) id AA07067; Wed, 16 Sep 92 10:57:00 -0400
Received: from xap.xyplex.com by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (5.61++/2.8s-UTK) id AA07043; Wed, 16 Sep 92 10:56:15 -0400
Received: by xap.xyplex.com id <AA21090@xap.xyplex.com>; Wed, 16 Sep 92 10:54:41 -0500
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 1992 10:54:41 -0500
Message-Id: <9209161554.AA21090@xap.xyplex.com>
From: Bob Stewart <rlstewart@eng.xyplex.com>
To: chassismib@cs.utk.edu
In-Reply-To: CASE@utkvx.utk.edu's message of Tue, 15 Sep 1992 20:53 EST <01GOTSBQHGSS8Y5CKU@utkvx.utk.edu>
Subject: Re: Dense?
>tweeet! (whistle blowing sound) >out of bounds! >that is SEP (somebody else's problem) >i fear we are stepping outside of our charter here >this issue rightly belongs in the purview of the folks who do repeater cards >and related management Thanks, Jeff. I also believe we're pushing a bit far when we get into details of segment mapping. We should do only what is common across our abstract entities and leave details to their individual MIBs. Bob
- Dense? David Perkins
- Re: Dense? David L. Arneson (arneson@ctron.com)
- Re: Dense? Bob Stewart
- Re: Dense? CASE
- Re: Dense? Keith McCloghrie
- Re: Dense? Bob Stewart