RE: mapping between entities and resources...
Manu Kaycee <firstname.lastname@example.org> Wed, 14 April 1993 21:50 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03869;
14 Apr 93 17:50 EDT
Received: from CS.UTK.EDU by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03865; 14 Apr 93 17:50 EDT
Received: from localhost by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (5.61+IDA+UTK-930125/2.8s-UTK) id AA25287; Wed, 14 Apr 93 17:20:58 -0400
X-Resent-To: chassismib@CS.UTK.EDU ; Wed, 14 Apr 1993 17:20:55 EDT
Received: from ub-gate.UB.com by CS.UTK.EDU with SMTP (5.61+IDA+UTK-930125/2.8s-UTK) id AA25275; Wed, 14 Apr 93 17:20:51 -0400
Received: from sunny.andr.UB.com (sunny.andr.UB.com) by ub-gate.UB.com (4.1/SMI-4.1[UB-1.8]) id AA15711; Wed, 14 Apr 93 14:20:39 PDT
Received: from psycho.andr.UB.com by sunny.andr.UB.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA29776; Wed, 14 Apr 93 17:20:37 EDT
Received: by psycho.andr.UB.com (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA05905; Wed, 14 Apr 93 17:21:32 EDT
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 93 17:21:32 EDT
From: Manu Kaycee <email@example.com>
Subject: RE: mapping between entities and resources...
Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com
Pete, > While you're waiting for the updated draft from Dave you might like to > re-read my proposal from last November where I first presented the new > model. I included descriptions of the model and a number of examples. This > should clarify some of your concerns. Note that in that proposal the term > 'component' was used instead of 'resource'. Most of the other terminology is > the same. I've deleted the copy of your proposal from last November. Due to work commitments back then, I was only able to skim through your proposal, and never really able to read through it thoroughly. So, if you could mail me a copy (no need to bother the list...I'm sure other interested parties have a copy), I promise I'll read it and furnish an in-depth assessment. > Pete /Manu.