Re: classless inaddr

Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Fri, 06 December 1996 12:06 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa11437; 6 Dec 96 7:06 EST
Received: from nico.aarnet.edu.au by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09717; 6 Dec 96 7:05 EST
Received: from roam.psg.com (roam.psg.com [204.119.8.3]) by nico.aarnet.edu.au (8.6.10/8.6.10) with SMTP id WAA11647 for <cidrd@iepg.org>; Fri, 6 Dec 1996 22:10:29 +1100
Received: by roam.psg.com id m0vVyA4-000IVRC; Fri, 6 Dec 96 03:09 PST (Smail3.1.29.1#2)
Message-Id: <m0vVyA4-000IVRC@roam.psg.com>
Date: Fri, 06 Dec 1996 03:09:00 -0800
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Geoff Huston <gih@telstra.net>
Cc: Hank Nussbacher <hank@ibm.net.il>, cidrd@iepg.org
Subject: Re: classless inaddr
References: <v02140b09aecd1b1458b6@[203.50.0.66]>

> I was under the impression that the draft was suitable for publication
> as a BCP as was. But its now a DNSIND call I suppose.

The authors recently issued a new draft, but the change was not, IMIHO,
sufficient to warrant a new last call in dnsind or IESG.

randy