Re: Route table/time growth matrix, pre/post CIDR

Matt Crawford <crawdad@fnal.gov> Fri, 04 April 1997 23:51 UTC

Received: from cnri by ietf.org id aa01250; 4 Apr 97 18:51 EST
Received: from nico.telstra.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21371; 4 Apr 97 18:51 EST
Received: from FNAL.FNAL.Gov (fnal.fnal.gov [131.225.110.17]) by nico.aarnet.edu.au (8.6.10/8.6.10) with ESMTP id IAA10592 for <cidrd@iepg.org>; Sat, 5 Apr 1997 08:39:53 +1000
Received: from gungnir.fnal.gov ("port 34047"@gungnir.fnal.gov) by FNAL.FNAL.GOV (PMDF V5.0-5 #3998) id <01IHBBSMBFLA00094R@FNAL.FNAL.GOV>; Fri, 04 Apr 1997 16:39:50 -0600
Received: from gungnir.fnal.gov by gungnir.fnal.gov (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4) id QAA25256; Fri, 04 Apr 1997 16:39:27 -0600
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 1997 16:39:27 -0600
From: Matt Crawford <crawdad@fnal.gov>
Subject: Re: Route table/time growth matrix, pre/post CIDR
In-reply-to: "04 Apr 1997 16:56:18 EST." <"199704042153.QAA01945"@MAILSERV-2HIGH.FTP.COM>
Sender: crawdad@gungnir.fnal.gov
To: Frank T Solensky <solensky@ftp.com>
Cc: pferguso@cisco.com, cidrd@iepg.org
Message-id: <199704042239.QAA25256@gungnir.fnal.gov>
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
X-Face: /RKQi"kntyd}7l)d8n%'Dum<~(aMW3,5g&'NiH5I4Jj|wT:j; Qa$!@A<~/*C:{:MmAQ:o%S /KKi}G4_.||4I[9!{%3]Hd"a*E{<k&QF?d6L7o&zLqb%kXn!!]ykXMKtTiy9#20]$EKP/^Z$T]'P6, 8L#r&mH4PB<ljN,_.=iCpv#N:HIcy5t7{HV:<=g=V?^;-d,J*xkq0r

> According to the most recent address dump I've got, there are
> 3159 nets that fall into the /25 to /29 range (there's no /30s)

But is that how many leaked into some observation point in the global
route tables, or does it include those that are fully aggregated into
shorter prefixes by the immediate provider?

			Matt