Re: [cin] Next Steps

Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Sun, 05 August 2012 21:14 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: cin@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: cin@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9284721F850D for <cin@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Aug 2012 14:14:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.574
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.574 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.025, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ppUOGJKw-QOw for <cin@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 5 Aug 2012 14:14:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og101.obsmtp.com (exprod7og101.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.155]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32FCE21F8566 for <cin@ietf.org>; Sun, 5 Aug 2012 14:14:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net ([66.129.224.36]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob101.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUB7iG3ErLHFpF/JIxTdZ3pTVrzC28rDx@postini.com; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 14:14:05 PDT
Received: from p-emfe01-wf.jnpr.net (172.28.145.24) by P-EMHUB03-HQ.jnpr.net (172.24.192.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Sun, 5 Aug 2012 14:14:03 -0700
Received: from EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net ([fe80::1914:3299:33d9:e43b]) by p-emfe01-wf.jnpr.net ([fe80::d0d1:653d:5b91:a123%11]) with mapi; Sun, 5 Aug 2012 17:14:02 -0400
From: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: Eric Burger <eburger@standardstrack.com>, "cin@ietf.org" <cin@ietf.org>
Date: Sun, 5 Aug 2012 17:14:01 -0400
Thread-Topic: [cin] Next Steps
Thread-Index: Ac1zOr0bbKtOhKgGQtSd1zu7oUyaCAAFExRw
Message-ID: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D77165311E@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net>
References: <13205C286662DE4387D9AF3AC30EF456D7716530FC@EMBX01-WF.jnpr.net> <0D8F655B-8E3B-4DE6-8CD3-0EC9818C4A16@standardstrack.com>
In-Reply-To: <0D8F655B-8E3B-4DE6-8CD3-0EC9818C4A16@standardstrack.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [cin] Next Steps
X-BeenThere: cin@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: <cin.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/cin>, <mailto:cin-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/cin>
List-Post: <mailto:cin@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cin-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cin>, <mailto:cin-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 21:14:06 -0000

Folks,

Depending on what the problem statement says, we may also need to interact with other IETF WGs, too. 

                                                                   Ron

> -----Original Message-----
> From: cin-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:cin-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Eric Burger
> Sent: Sunday, August 05, 2012 2:47 PM
> To: cin@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [cin] Next Steps
> 
> Part of this process is identifying other bodies working on this or
> similar topics.  The goal is positive, in that it identifies potential
> partners for the work.  The goal is also negative, in that we may find
> better venues than the IETF to do the work.  It is much better for us
> to identify those groups that are in this space and explain either why
> they will be a partner or are not relevant to our work.
> 
> I can help get the overall process done, but I don't know the space
> well enough to list what's out there. Clearly there is input and
> interaction with ICAO, FERC, and FDA for the aerospace, smart grid, and
> medical devices fields respectively. I am sure there are organizations
> out there, like IEEE for medical devices, NIST for FERC, and possibly
> the Aerospace Industries Association for aerospace.
> 
> Can someone step up, at least one from each of the target use cases, to
> enumerate those related groups?
> 
> There is a lot more stuff to do, but the problem statement that Terry
> Davis and Bob Moskowitz are working on and this list of the ecosystem
> are what we need right now.
> 
> 
> On Aug 5, 2012, at 9:44 AM, Ronald Bonica wrote:
> 
> > Folks,
> >
> > At the Bar BoF, several participants expressed interest in holding a
> real BoF in Atlanta. If this is still the intent, I recommend that the
> group:
> >
> > - read RFC 5434: Considerations for Having a Successful Birds-of-a-
> Feather (BOF) Session
> > - Ensure that the steps described in Section 2 of that draft have
> been executed (or at least considered)
> > - Articulate the problem statement (preferably in an Internet Draft)
> > - Discuss the problem statement on this mailing list
> >
> > There will be many requests for BoFs in Atlanta. Your odds of getting
> a BoF greatly improve if you follow the process described in 5434.
> >
> > --------------------------
> > Ron Bonica
> > vcard:       www.bonica.org/ron/ronbonica.vcf
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cin mailing list
> > cin@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cin