Re: Comments on Stds track RFC Internet Draft

"Robert G. Moskowitz" <0003858921@mcimail.com> Thu, 15 July 1993 14:18 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03248; 15 Jul 93 10:18 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03243; 15 Jul 93 10:18 EDT
Received: from list.nih.gov by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa09503; 15 Jul 93 10:18 EDT
Received: from LIST.NIH.GOV by LIST.NIH.GOV (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 2983; Thu, 15 Jul 93 10:18:17 EDT
Received: from LIST.NIH.GOV by LIST.NIH.GOV (Mailer R2.10 ptf000) with BSMTP id 2979; Thu, 15 Jul 93 10:16:14 EDT
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1993 14:03:00 GMT
Reply-To: IETF TN3270E Working Group List <TN3270E@list.nih.gov>
X-Orig-Sender: IETF TN3270E Working Group List <TN3270E@list.nih.gov>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Robert G. Moskowitz" <0003858921@mcimail.com>
Subject: Re: Comments on Stds track RFC Internet Draft
X-To: IETF TN3270E Working Group List <TN3270E@list.nih.gov>
To: Multiple recipients of list TN3270E <TN3270E@list.nih.gov>
Message-ID: <9307151018.aa09503@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>

Bill posted his draft on July 9th.  As of this morning, July 15th.  There
has been no discussion of the draft.  I have received a couple of private
messages that indirectly refer to it, but that is all.

It is my intention to submit Bill's work to IETF for posting on July 23rd if
there are no comments or additions.  I might still do a first submission
then to 'get it on the books' unless there is considerable discussion on
major changes.

Perhaps the quite is due to vacations or heavy reading of Bill's work.  I
did not see many of our members in the published list of IETF 27
attendees...

Robert Moskowitz
Chrysler Corp
TN3270E WG Chair