IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Status of RFCE

Eddie Renoux <elr0262@newsit2.mcdata.com> Tue, 15 March 1994 14:15 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03763; 15 Mar 94 9:15 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03759; 15 Mar 94 9:15 EST
Received: from list.nih.gov by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05335; 15 Mar 94 9:14 EST
Received: from LIST.NIH.GOV by LIST.NIH.GOV (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 1399; Tue, 15 Mar 94 09:12:49 EST
Received: from LIST.NIH.GOV by LIST.NIH.GOV (Mailer R2.10 ptf000) with BSMTP id 1398; Tue, 15 Mar 94 09:12:43 EST
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 1994 07:12:04 -0700
Reply-To: IETF TN3270E Working Group List <TN3270E@list.nih.gov>
X-Orig-Sender: IETF TN3270E Working Group List <TN3270E@list.nih.gov>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Eddie Renoux <elr0262@newsit2.mcdata.com>
Subject: Re: Status of RFCE
X-To: TN3270E@LIST.NIH.GOV
To: Multiple recipients of list TN3270E <TN3270E@list.nih.gov>
In-Reply-To: <9403151309.AA28150@newsit2.mcdata.com> from "Robert G. Moskowitz" at Mar 15, 94 08:03:00 am
Message-ID: <9403150915.aa05335@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>

> So I submit to the group that we instruct OCS to do the word-smithing so
> that RFCE reads like current practices:  'here is how 3287 print and LU
> selection has been addressed with the current TN3270 protocol'.
>
> Comments?
>
> Bob
>
Sounds good to me.
Eddie Renoux  elr@mcdata.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email