IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RFCS - Telnet commands mixed with 3270 data

Eddie Renoux <elr0262@newsit2.mcdata.com> Tue, 15 March 1994 14:48 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04751; 15 Mar 94 9:48 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04747; 15 Mar 94 9:48 EST
Received: from list.nih.gov by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07304; 15 Mar 94 9:48 EST
Received: from LIST.NIH.GOV by LIST.NIH.GOV (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 1500; Tue, 15 Mar 94 09:44:42 EST
Received: from LIST.NIH.GOV by LIST.NIH.GOV (Mailer R2.10 ptf000) with BSMTP id 1497; Tue, 15 Mar 94 09:31:19 EST
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 1994 07:28:09 -0700
Reply-To: IETF TN3270E Working Group List <TN3270E@list.nih.gov>
X-Orig-Sender: IETF TN3270E Working Group List <TN3270E@list.nih.gov>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Eddie Renoux <elr0262@newsit2.mcdata.com>
Subject: Re: RFCS - Telnet commands mixed with 3270 data
X-To: TN3270E@LIST.NIH.GOV
To: Multiple recipients of list TN3270E <TN3270E@list.nih.gov>
In-Reply-To: <9403151311.AA28198@newsit2.mcdata.com> from "Robert G. Moskowitz" at Mar 15, 94 08:03:00 am
Message-ID: <9403150948.aa07304@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>

> Opinions on which way we should go on IACs within a 3270 datastream will be
> solicited until the end of the week.  I would like to have the last call on
> IETF issued on this before the Thursday of next week when I go on vacation
> for Passover (and before IETF at Seattle).
>
> Bob
I like having no TELNET IACs within the TN3270 datastream.  This would make
the examination of the datastream that the server has to do much easier.  It
would also eliminate the possibility of confusion if a "pseudo" ATTN (IP)
were found (allowed) in the middle of a TN3270 datastream.
(I realize the server still has to strip the doubled IACs.)
Eddie Renoux  elr@mcdata.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email