Re: TN3270 RFC (RFCE)

Cleve Graves <cvg@oc.com> Tue, 20 July 1993 17:06 UTC

Date: Tue, 20 Jul 1993 12:05:11 -0600
Reply-To: cvg@oc.com
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Cleve Graves <cvg@oc.com>
Subject: Re: TN3270 RFC (RFCE)
To: Multiple recipients of list TN3270E <TN3270E@list.nih.gov>
Message-ID: <9307201306.aa14878@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>

azi and others,
     I aploligize for the brain death of the RFCE posting I made yesterday.
My posting has been called RFCE in our previous discussions and I got my
wires crossed yesterday and posted it as TN3270E instead of RFCE (just got
back from vacation and I'm brain dead).
     Bill's posting is the new RFCS standard for improving TN3270 and my
posting is the draft for TN3287E based on the present TN3270 protocols,
which are due to be documented in the RFCI effort.
     Sorry for the confusion!

Cleve

P.S. Bill and Bob, The new SNA what is it section I added to the from of
the document might be better in the RFCI document, as it is really relevant
to all 3 of our RFCs.



In message Tue, 20 Jul 93 17:41:43 +0200, rndi!azi@uunet.UU.NET (azi)  writes:

>
>Cleve,
>
>Can you tell me the diffrence between your TN3270E RFC to the one published
>by Bill Kelly ?  Are those  diffrent suggestions ?
>
>
>Elazar (Azi) Ronen
>Software development manager,RADLINX Ltd.
>7 Arad st.
>Tel Aviv 69710
>Israel
>
>Tel: 972-3-6475188
>Fax: 972-3-6475057
>Email: rndi!azi@uunet.uu.net or uunet.uu.net!rndi!azi
Thanks,     Cleve                       Internet-Mailid CVG@OC.COM
Technical Marketing
OpenConnect Systems, Inc.
2711 LBJ Freeway
Dallas,Texas      75234                (214) 888-0416   FAX (214) 484-0688

Re: TN3270 RFC (RFCE) Cleve Graves