Re: Formal IAB appeal: IESG paralysis and inactivity

Claudio Topolcic <topolcic@bbn.com> Thu, 02 March 1995 16:51 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07829; 2 Mar 95 11:51 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07825; 2 Mar 95 11:51 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08569; 2 Mar 95 11:51 EST
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07816; 2 Mar 95 11:51 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07803; 2 Mar 95 11:51 EST
Received: from BBN.COM by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08559; 2 Mar 95 11:51 EST
Received: from PEREGRINE.BBN.COM by BBN.COM id aa28025; 2 Mar 95 11:31 EST
Received: from peregrine.bbn.com (LOCALHOST.BBN.COM [127.0.0.1]) by peregrine.bbn.com (8.6.9/8.6.5) with ESMTP id LAA03462; Thu, 2 Mar 1995 11:31:09 -0500
Message-Id: <199503021631.LAA03462@peregrine.bbn.com>
To: Steve Coya <scoya@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
cc: iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: Formal IAB appeal: IESG paralysis and inactivity
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 01 Mar 1995 11:10:32 EST." <9503011110.aa05128@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 1995 11:31:08 -0500
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Claudio Topolcic <topolcic@bbn.com>

Steve,

	I suggest we put the Motorola patent issue on the IESG agenda.
I agree that this issue is not on the IESG's plate. We just receive
the status reports. We should say so publically.  Actually, we should
have said so months ago.
	Claudio