Re: Status of RFCE

Roger Fajman <RAF@cu.nih.gov> Tue, 15 March 1994 23:36 UTC

Date: Tue, 15 Mar 1994 18:29:43 -0500
Reply-To: IETF TN3270E Working Group List <TN3270E@list.nih.gov>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Roger Fajman <RAF@cu.nih.gov>
Subject: Re: Status of RFCE
To: Multiple recipients of list TN3270E <TN3270E@list.nih.gov>
Message-ID: <9403151836.aa22633@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>

> >It seems to me that, if the luname_print were rewritten to be clearly a
> >second "current practices" document--"this is what some folks are doing,
> >even if we can't strongly recommend it"-- it would sail through, although
> >more easily yet if in the context of a finished extensions doc.
>
> So I submit to the group that we instruct OCS to do the word-smithing so
> that RFCE reads like current practices:  'here is how 3287 print and LU
> selection has been addressed with the current TN3270 protocol'.

Yes, I agree.

Roger Fajman                                   Telephone:  +1 301 402 4265
National Institutes of Health                  BITNET:     RAF@NIHCU
Bethesda, Maryland, USA                        Internet:   RAF@CU.NIH.GOV

Status of RFCE Robert G. Moskowitz
Re: Status of RFCE Eddie Renoux
Re: Status of RFCE Roger Fajman
Re: Status of RFCE fab