Re: Comments on Stds track RFC Internet Draft

Fred Bohle <fab@md.interlink.com> Thu, 15 July 1993 21:01 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06235; 15 Jul 93 17:01 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06231; 15 Jul 93 17:01 EDT
Received: from list.nih.gov by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa21271; 15 Jul 93 17:01 EDT
Received: from LIST.NIH.GOV by LIST.NIH.GOV (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 3838; Thu, 15 Jul 93 17:01:11 EDT
Received: from LIST.NIH.GOV by LIST.NIH.GOV (Mailer R2.10 ptf000) with BSMTP id 3833; Thu, 15 Jul 93 17:01:03 EDT
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 1993 17:00:41 EDT
Reply-To: IETF TN3270E Working Group List <TN3270E@list.nih.gov>
X-Orig-Sender: IETF TN3270E Working Group List <TN3270E@list.nih.gov>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Fred Bohle <fab@md.interlink.com>
Subject: Re: Comments on Stds track RFC Internet Draft
X-To: TN3270E@LIST.NIH.GOV
To: Multiple recipients of list TN3270E <TN3270E@list.nih.gov>
Message-ID: <9307151701.aa21271@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>

On the contrary, I have marked up about half the pages in Bill Kelly's draft,
but I am busy putting out fires, and cannot finish the response I am composing.

Comments will follow.....

Fred
>
>Bill posted his draft on July 9th.  As of this morning, July 15th.  There
>has been no discussion of the draft.  I have received a couple of private
>messages that indirectly refer to it, but that is all.
>
>