Re: Formal IAB appeal: IESG paralysis and inactivity

stev@ftp.com Wed, 01 March 1995 15:09 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03854; 1 Mar 95 10:09 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03850; 1 Mar 95 10:09 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06449; 1 Mar 95 10:08 EST
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03834; 1 Mar 95 10:08 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03830; 1 Mar 95 10:08 EST
Received: from ftp.com by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa06440; 1 Mar 95 10:08 EST
Received: from ftp.com by ftp.com ; Wed, 1 Mar 1995 10:09:19 -0500
Received: from mailserv-D.ftp.com by ftp.com ; Wed, 1 Mar 1995 10:09:19 -0500
Received: from stev.d-cell.ftp.com by mailserv-D.ftp.com (5.0/SMI-SVR4) id AA05702; Wed, 1 Mar 95 10:07:37 EST
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 95 10:07:37 EST
Message-Id: <9503011507.AA05702@mailserv-D.ftp.com>
To: iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: Formal IAB appeal: IESG paralysis and inactivity
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: stev@ftp.com
X-Orig-Sender: stev@mailserv-d.ftp.com
Repository: mailserv-D.ftp.com, [message accepted at Wed Mar 1 10:07:26 1995]
Originating-Client: d-cell.ftp.com
Content-Length: 325

    Motorola sent a letter to the IETF.  The IETF Secretariate has refused
    to disclose the contents of that letter, despite repeated verbal and
    written requests.
    
i was under the impression that we were sharing all correspondance
with the WG chair, is this true? is there a reason we dont share it
with the WG?