Re: Newly revised standards-track RFC
Roger Fajman <RAF@cu.nih.gov> Mon, 21 March 1994 23:37 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17186; 21 Mar 94 18:37 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa17178; 21 Mar 94 18:37 EST
Received: from list.nih.gov by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa02959; 21 Mar 94 18:37 EST
Received: from LIST.NIH.GOV by LIST.NIH.GOV (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with BSMTP id 8262; Mon, 21 Mar 94 18:35:09 EST
Received: from LIST.NIH.GOV by LIST.NIH.GOV (Mailer R2.10 ptf000) with BSMTP id 8261; Mon, 21 Mar 94 18:32:49 EST
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 1994 18:30:29 -0500
Reply-To: IETF TN3270E Working Group List <TN3270E@list.nih.gov>
X-Orig-Sender: IETF TN3270E Working Group List <TN3270E@list.nih.gov>
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Roger Fajman <RAF@cu.nih.gov>
Subject: Re: Newly revised standards-track RFC
X-To: TN3270E@LIST.NIH.GOV
To: Multiple recipients of list TN3270E <TN3270E@list.nih.gov>
Message-ID: <9403211837.aa02959@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
> The presence of Telnet commands within a TN3270E data message > (i.e., between the header and the trailing IAC EOR) is not > supported; neither clients nor servers should send such data. If a > TN3270E data message containing an IAC-command sequence (other than > IAC IAC) is received, the receiver should discard the IAC-command > sequence and continue processing the TN3270E data message. > IAC-commands should be sent between TN3270E data messages, with no > header and no trailing IAC EOR. Sounds OK to me. Roger Fajman Telephone: +1 301 402 4265 National Institutes of Health BITNET: RAF@NIHCU Bethesda, Maryland, USA Internet: RAF@CU.NIH.GOV
- Newly revised standards-track RFC Bill Kelly
- Re: Newly revised standards-track RFC Roger Fajman
- Re: Newly revised standards-track RFC Roger Fajman
- Re: Newly revised standards-track RFC fab
- Re: Newly revised standards-track RFC Bill Kelly
- Re: Newly revised standards-track RFC fab
- Re: Newly revised standards-track RFC David A. Borman
- Re: Newly revised standards-track RFC Bill Kelly
- Re: Newly revised standards-track RFC fab
- Re: Newly revised standards-track RFC David A. Borman
- Re: Newly revised standards-track RFC Robert G. Moskowitz
- Re: Newly revised standards-track RFC Roger Fajman
- Re: Newly revised standards-track RFC Jagan Bearelly
- Re: Newly revised standards-track RFC fab
- Re: Newly revised standards-track RFC David A. Borman
- Re: Newly revised standards-track RFC fab
- Re: Newly revised standards-track RFC Roger Fajman
- Re: Newly revised standards-track RFC David A. Borman
- Re: Newly revised standards-track RFC Robert G. Moskowitz
- Re: Newly revised standards-track RFC Bill Kelly
- Re: Newly revised standards-track RFC Roger Fajman
- Re: Newly revised standards-track RFC Pierre Goyette - The 3270 Man
- Re: Newly revised standards-track RFC Peter DiCamillo