Re: Comments on MIME/SGML
"Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@hal.com> Tue, 22 February 1994 19:05 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10028; 22 Feb 94 14:05 EST
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10024; 22 Feb 94 14:05 EST
Received: from dimacs.rutgers.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa13254; 22 Feb 94 14:05 EST
Received: by dimacs.rutgers.edu (5.59/SMI4.0/RU1.5/3.08) id AA06105; Tue, 22 Feb 94 13:29:01 EST
Received: from hal.COM by dimacs.rutgers.edu (5.59/SMI4.0/RU1.5/3.08) id AA06100; Tue, 22 Feb 94 13:28:59 EST
Received: from ulua.hal.com by hal.com (4.1/SMI-4.1.1) id AA04029; Tue, 22 Feb 94 10:22:39 PST
Received: from localhost by ulua.hal.com (4.1/SMI-4.1.2) id AA10361; Tue, 22 Feb 94 12:22:43 CST
Message-Id: <9402221822.AA10361@ulua.hal.com>
To: timbl@www0.cern.ch
Cc: Multiple Recipients of List <ietf-822@dimacs.rutgers.edu>, Terry Allen GNN representative <terry@ora.com>, Dave Raggett -- HTML+ draft spec author <dsr@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, Dave Hollander -- SDL designer <dmh@hpfcma.fc.hp.com>, Elliot Kimber -- HyTime advocate <kimber@passage.com>, Peter Flynn -- HTML educator <pflynn@curia.ucc.ie>, Rob McCool -- NCSA representative <robm@ncsa.uiuc.edu>, Erik Naggum -- SGML advocate <erik@naggum.no>, WWW Talk List -- Archive Mechanism <www-talk@www0.cern.ch>
Subject: Re: Comments on MIME/SGML
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 21 Feb 1994 16:09:10 +0100." <9402211509.AA01936@ptpc00.cern.ch>
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 1994 12:22:42 -0600
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: "Daniel W. Connolly" <connolly@hal.com>
In message <9402211509.AA01936@ptpc00.cern.ch>, Tim Berners-Lee writes: >Dan, > >> 1. We make the following correspondence between the terms of the SGML >> standard and the MIME RFC: > > >... >> SGML SYSTEM identifier => MIME Content-ID > > I proposed in an earlier note that the SGML SYSTEM identifier > should be a URI and that a special form of URI (cid:) should > be used to specify a content identifier within a MIME > multipart message. > > > SGM SYSTEM identifier => URI > > > This allows SGML to reference anything in the universal > syntax, inclusing now URLs and later URNs, and > other parts of a MIME object using the cid: form. > I think this is important, as external references > are important too, and one will need to mix them. So far we've only been talking about MIME and SGML. Neither MIME tools nor SGML tools currently grok URI's. I see no reason to introduce that much new technology just to allow a MIME message to hold multiple SGML entities. Besides: MIME already specifies a way to reference bodies outside the message: message/external-body. e.g.: Content-Type: multipart/x-sgml; boundary="cut-here"; document=id1 --cut-here Content-ID: id1 Content-Type: text/x-sgml <!DOCTYPE HTML [ <!ENTITY % htmldtd SYSTEM "id2"> &htmldtd; ]> <html>...</html> --cut-here Content-ID: id2 Content-Type: message/external-body; access-type="anon-ftp"; site="info.cern.ch"; directory="pub/www/doc"; name="HTML.dtd" Content-Type: text/x-sgml; --cut-here-- Dan
- Comments on MIME/SGML Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: Comments on MIME/SGML Tim Berners-Lee
- Re: Comments on MIME/SGML Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: Comments on MIME/SGML Ed Levinson
- Re: Comments on MIME/SGML Ed Levinson
- Re: Comments on MIME/SGML Daniel W. Connolly
- Re: Comments on MIME/SGML Ed Levinson
- Re: Comments on MIME/SGML Jim Conklin
- Re: Comments on MIME/SGML Keith Moore
- Re: Comments on MIME/SGML Steve Dorner