Re: [clouds] preliminary list of Clouds WGs/SDOs/...

Melinda Shore <shore@arsc.edu> Thu, 10 June 2010 18:48 UTC

Return-Path: <shore@arsc.edu>
X-Original-To: clouds@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: clouds@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C1AE3A697D for <clouds@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:48:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id J-UfG5t2xhhR for <clouds@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:48:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from arsc.edu (mail1.arsc.edu [IPv6:2001:480:150:75::229]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8E2A3A6976 for <clouds@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 11:48:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from viking-e0.arsc.edu (viking-e0.arsc.edu [IPv6:2001:480:150:75:223:32ff:feda:4a52]) by arsc.edu (20090828.ARSC) with ESMTP id o5AIlwKP027190; Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:47:59 -0800 (AKDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Melinda Shore <shore@arsc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <p06240847c8360c6f372b@[10.20.30.158]>
Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 10:47:42 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3F83A7F8-A969-4F17-807A-726EBE93443D@arsc.edu>
References: <AANLkTilZ4XA4XJXsusfX13f7hsPqsj54MvGW9k1e5vCP@mail.gmail.com> <p06240847c8360c6f372b@[10.20.30.158]>
To: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078)
X-CanIt-Geo: No geolocation information available for 2001:480:150:75:223:32ff:feda:4a52
X-CanItPRO-Stream: default
X-Canit-Stats-ID: Bayes signature not available
X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on IPv6:2001:480:150:75::167
Cc: clouds@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [clouds] preliminary list of Clouds WGs/SDOs/...
X-BeenThere: clouds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Clouds pre-BOF discussion list <clouds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clouds>, <mailto:clouds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/clouds>
List-Post: <mailto:clouds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:clouds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clouds>, <mailto:clouds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2010 18:48:09 -0000

On Jun 9, 2010, at 7:32 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> Sorry, but that is completely unacceptable for IETF work, particularly a bar BoF.

I think I'd probably say that a little differently: This isn't
IETF work and if people want it to become IETF work they can't
claim copyright on contributions.

I still really hate that this effort seems to take the form
of a fishing expedition.  What this process is communicating to
me is "We haven't identified a problem."  I'd be a little sorry 
to see the IETF allocate resources (meeting space, time, IESG 
oversight, whatever) until these folks have figured out what
needs work.

Melinda