Re: [clouds] IESG/IAB response to the Clouds BOF request in Beijing

Bhumip Khasnabish <vumip1@gmail.com> Sun, 26 September 2010 17:20 UTC

Return-Path: <vumip1@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: clouds@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: clouds@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07663A6B84 for <clouds@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:20:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.138
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.138 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.460, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O1+f-rul1WQF for <clouds@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:20:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-iw0-f172.google.com (mail-iw0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F11D3A6B7E for <clouds@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:20:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by iwn3 with SMTP id 3so4670565iwn.31 for <clouds@ietf.org>; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:21:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=2LcureijfGhOHQN/fEiXUoEX6lnIQQ18BEs/XiMXKPM=; b=ae+SMgxQFxgNIkNqeyWHuzMXJJmammB1WS7cWbQBtcoZN19nYjKIi8UnoZzjaEGM+z 1qaVC9iidn0j/sBE13AooIyQTiXN0qZT+yI7Ffo/9NZxFgosYnKkyOkRASkGusUqy3ut 36TUsRT0Ya9hqh4GPiU14zVmeyEVzxkQN6I/8=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=I6QHDr3POsJN9tw6ibtjI9RgatbGzZEXI35taY5cuF1C6ULFqeKd1i4dnb3Uw1t/SE AUoaiZ5iRQNZdGEw6UleKjkrFu1UdhQb00KhfOQOLJA5wnQWDEGKiollM3/FR4yQhaiF FarXK9Od/I3YVj/uy0ZH2DLLkyK4H159RyDnM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.13.140 with SMTP id c12mr7468275iba.25.1285521673053; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:21:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.31.195 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:21:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <29DEBC211D72497AA8A410F9D6977689@china.huawei.com>
References: <4C93C824.3020304@isode.com> <4C93C9AE.5050604@isode.com> <4C93CAE6.3070702@viagenie.ca> <4C93CBE5.2020708@isode.com> <29DEBC211D72497AA8A410F9D6977689@china.huawei.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:21:13 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=9jqHn-=8QE5qrJzfns4Vr3R+kY=RrUxXZgRWN@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bhumip Khasnabish <vumip1@gmail.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins <spencer@wonderhamster.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=002215046ae3ac685104912cd6c7
Cc: clouds@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [clouds] IESG/IAB response to the Clouds BOF request in Beijing
X-BeenThere: clouds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Clouds pre-BOF discussion list <clouds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clouds>, <mailto:clouds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/clouds>
List-Post: <mailto:clouds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:clouds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clouds>, <mailto:clouds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:20:38 -0000

Thanks for your comments and suggestions, Spencer.

In addition to developing the proposed drafts, we are continuing to work on
resolving the overlap and scope issues. We plan to hold another Clouds bar
BoF during IETF-79.

The Clouds BoF proponents will meet with the IAB/IESG during IETF-79 in
Beijing. Alexey is helping us confirm further details of that 'small and
informal' mtg.

Best.


 On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Spencer Dawkins <spencer@wonderhamster.org
> wrote:

> Just to echo what Alexey said ... and speaking as an individual ...
>
> It is true that there are protocols that touch multiple areas, and the IESG
> did approve at least one BOF request that is RIGHT on the border between TSV
> and INT yesterday, so that's not a fatal flaw.
>
> What concerned me is that there were so many work items that were spread
> across so many areas. I can't imagine chairing a group like that - I'm not
> even sure I can imagine filling out the conflict list!
>
> I agree with Alexey here. My suggestion is to identify small discrete work
> items, focusing on what the protocol work is (because that's what IETF does
> best), and submit them individually to the right area directors.
>
> I hope this is helpful.
>
> Spencer
>  _______________________________________________
> clouds mailing list
> clouds@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clouds
>



-- 
Best Regards.

Bhumip Khasnabish (Mobile:+001-781-752-8003, vumip1@gmail.com)