Re: [clouds] Clouds BoF (during IETF-79) submitted
Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org> Fri, 17 September 2010 14:45 UTC
Return-Path: <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
X-Original-To: clouds@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: clouds@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F193A6778 for <clouds@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 07:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.283
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.283 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.763, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hVFDjLvMpqmN for <clouds@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 07:45:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hoffman.proper.com (Hoffman.Proper.COM [207.182.41.81]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF2483A677D for <clouds@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Sep 2010 07:45:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.20.30.158] (75-101-30-90.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [75.101.30.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.4/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o8HEkA6g041902 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 17 Sep 2010 07:46:11 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <p06240852c8b92effccc2@[10.20.30.158]>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinjCp9i9a4SJH=mec4jLJ_QTDy8VrnTds4dvTT4@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTikziT-LUjSMK=A4LLNS_KF5NFmTORZZyKPUyvCF@mail.gmail.com> <p06240875c8b546d974af@10.20.30.158> <AANLkTinjCp9i9a4SJH=mec4jLJ_QTDy8VrnTds4dvTT4@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 07:46:08 -0700
To: Bhumip Khasnabish <vumip1@gmail.com>
From: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: clouds@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [clouds] Clouds BoF (during IETF-79) submitted
X-BeenThere: clouds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Clouds pre-BOF discussion list <clouds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clouds>, <mailto:clouds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/clouds>
List-Post: <mailto:clouds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:clouds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clouds>, <mailto:clouds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:45:48 -0000
At 11:40 PM -0400 9/16/10, Bhumip Khasnabish wrote: >Sure, will work closely with the relevant operations groups for those work items >that "seem to be about things that would be in the Operations Area." Ummm, that doesn't answer the question of why this is proposed to be part of the Applications Area. Is most of the work applications protocol work? It doesn't seem that way from the presentations and the list traffic. Alexey, can you speak to the reasoning here? --Paul Hoffman, Director --VPN Consortium
- [clouds] Clouds BoF (during IETF-79) submitted Bhumip Khasnabish
- Re: [clouds] Clouds BoF (during IETF-79) submitted Paul Hoffman
- Re: [clouds] Clouds BoF (during IETF-79) submitted Bhumip Khasnabish
- Re: [clouds] Clouds BoF (during IETF-79) submitted Paul Hoffman