Re: [clouds] __答复:_scope_of_the_cloud

Mark Webb <mwebb@cisco.com> Tue, 13 April 2010 20:39 UTC

Return-Path: <mwebb@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: clouds@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: clouds@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F5A28C1A8 for <clouds@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:39:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.264
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.264 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312=1.345]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S+9gJcvHZKFf for <clouds@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:39:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-5.cisco.com (sj-iport-5.cisco.com [171.68.10.87]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57BB43A6A80 for <clouds@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:38:36 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-5.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAI5yxEurRN+J/2dsb2JhbACbRXGjeJojhQ0E
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.52,199,1270425600"; d="scan'208,217"; a="182503456"
Received: from sj-core-3.cisco.com ([171.68.223.137]) by sj-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Apr 2010 20:38:19 +0000
Received: from dhcp-171-71-119-220.cisco.com (dhcp-171-71-119-220.cisco.com [171.71.119.220]) by sj-core-3.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o3DKcJXf019368; Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:38:19 GMT
Message-Id: <92648F46-12F1-4CF8-BFD1-77E3E2DE4C15@cisco.com>
From: Mark Webb <mwebb@cisco.com>
To: Sam Johnston <sjj@google.com>
In-Reply-To: <w2o460b71b91004090146te13e3415y72f3d870b3de408b@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail-45-826122660"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:38:18 -0400
References: <201004091421281408197@chinamobile.com> <OF97A02D2D.F12C57AA-ON48257700.0025B7E9-48257700.00267C69@zte.com.cn> <i2kda8464b11004090045scff74af9qd5a43fde4cc2df31@mail.gmail.com> <201004091607326563002@chinamobile.com> <w2o460b71b91004090146te13e3415y72f3d870b3de408b@mail.gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: "clouds@ietf.org" <clouds@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [clouds] __答复:_scope_of_the_cloud
X-BeenThere: clouds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Clouds pre-BOF discussion list <clouds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clouds>, <mailto:clouds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/clouds>
List-Post: <mailto:clouds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:clouds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clouds>, <mailto:clouds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 20:39:04 -0000

On Apr 9, 2010, at 4:46 AM, Sam Johnston wrote:

> We're also missing a way of describing containers (e.g. hypervisors,  
> platforms, etc.) and workloads (e.g. applications, virtual machines).

I really think this is the realm of DMTF.  They have a good start with  
OVF. There is more to do, (network, security and policy abstraction to  
name a couple) but it would be good for the industry if those  
container issues were mostly handled in this same place.

Mark Webb