IETF Logo Mail Archive

[clouds] 答复: scope of the cloud

meng.yu@zte.com.cn Fri, 09 April 2010 07:04 UTC

Return-Path: <meng.yu@zte.com.cn>
X-Original-To: clouds@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: clouds@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED04E3A67EB; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 00:04:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -88.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-88.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_05=-1.11, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_52=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_56=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_81=0.6, J_CHICKENPOX_82=0.6, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, MIME_BASE64_TEXT=1.753, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45, RCVD_DOUBLE_IP_LOOSE=0.76, SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312=1.345, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id S3qMpPcDF27I; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 00:04:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx5.zte.com.cn (mx5.zte.com.cn [63.217.80.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E99A3A67E3; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 00:04:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.30.17.100] by mx5.zte.com.cn with surfront esmtp id 368872668162798; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 15:02:08 +0800 (CST)
Received: from [192.168.168.1] by [192.168.168.16] with StormMail ESMTP id 65934.5147255223; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 15:01:39 +0800 (CST)
Received: from notes_smtp.zte.com.cn ([10.30.1.239]) by mse2.zte.com.cn with ESMTP id o3970VDj016673; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 15:00:31 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from meng.yu@zte.com.cn)
In-Reply-To: <201004091421281408197@chinamobile.com>
To: zhangyunfei <zhangyunfei@chinamobile.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.5.6 March 06, 2007
Message-ID: <OF97A02D2D.F12C57AA-ON48257700.0025B7E9-48257700.00267C69@zte.com.cn>
From: meng.yu@zte.com.cn
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 15:00:18 +0800
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on notes_smtp/zte_ltd(Release 6.5.4|March 27, 2005) at 2010-04-09 15:00:22, Serialize complete at 2010-04-09 15:00:22
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=_alternative 00267C6648257700_="
X-MAIL: mse2.zte.com.cn o3970VDj016673
Cc: "clouds@ietf.org" <clouds@ietf.org>, clouds-bounces@ietf.org
Subject: [clouds] 答复: scope of the cloud
X-BeenThere: clouds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Clouds pre-BOF discussion list <clouds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clouds>, <mailto:clouds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/clouds>
List-Post: <mailto:clouds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:clouds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clouds>, <mailto:clouds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 07:04:54 -0000

Not only (virtual )resource/(or tasks) migration esp. in different clouds, 
but migration from different servers in one cloud, I think it could be 
resonable.

Further, I am thinking could them be harmonized together for the protocol 
aspect?




"zhangyunfei" <zhangyunfei@chinamobile.com> 
发件人:  clouds-bounces@ietf.org
2010-04-09 14:21

收件人
"clouds@ietf.org" <clouds@ietf.org>, "sjj" <sjj@google.com>
抄送

主题
[clouds] scope of the cloud






Hi all.
    Some kindly told me that my email is not displayed corretly.So send 
again.
-------------------------------------------------
 
Sam and all,
   The topic of standardizing (virtual )resource migration esp. in 
different clouds you mentioned sounds interesting.Do you have more details 
to share?Thanks.
    Another point:Is there standard protocols in interconnecting different 
regions of clusters?I thinks if there are room to expolore,it would be a 
suitable topic in IETF.
 
BR
Yunfei
 
 

zhangyunfei
2010-04-09_______________________________________________
clouds mailing list
clouds@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clouds

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email