Re: [clouds] What are we doing here?

Gene Golovinsky <> Mon, 02 August 2010 13:40 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id D23453A69F3 for <>; Mon, 2 Aug 2010 06:40:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.264
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.264 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DvTJoaDpIgZo for <>; Mon, 2 Aug 2010 06:40:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8CF3A68D9 for <>; Mon, 2 Aug 2010 06:40:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (localhost []) by (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 7DD5834E8563; Mon, 2 Aug 2010 09:40:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ( []) by (SMTP Server) with ESMTPS id 3817E34E858C; Mon, 2 Aug 2010 09:40:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi; Mon, 2 Aug 2010 08:40:49 -0500
From: Gene Golovinsky <>
To: Nathaniel Borenstein <>, Paul Unbehagen <>
Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2010 08:40:48 -0500
Thread-Topic: [clouds] What are we doing here?
Thread-Index: Acsx3jyxh4Uh5a2oRim13NL7wS7fBAAaX/nQ
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <294030129BF751408412C35312657D974E7991B241@qtdenexmbm21.AD.QINTRA.COM> <> <> <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Sam Johnston <>, "" <>, "Fargano, Michael" <>
Subject: Re: [clouds] What are we doing here?
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Clouds pre-BOF discussion list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Aug 2010 13:40:34 -0000

Hi Nathaniel.

While lots of people are excited about general technology, several very concrete ideas were presented at the BoF.

It is true that Cloud is diverse, but some problem spaces are understood better that others.
Security and Interfaces are examples of those better understood areas.
If you look at the list of IDs committed for the next meeting, you will see just that.


-----Original Message-----
From: [] On Behalf Of Nathaniel Borenstein
Sent: Sunday, August 01, 2010 8:01 PM
To: Paul Unbehagen
Cc: Sam Johnston;; Fargano, Michael
Subject: [clouds] What are we doing here?

I missed the BoF, so please excuse me if this is clear to everyone but me, however...

What are we trying to accomplish?

Standards efforts tend to be most successful if there are clear goals in mind.  What I'm seeing is a bunch of people who are excited about the general idea of cloud standards, each with a few particular ideas in mind.  Things like reference architectures can be very useful in the context of a well-developed set of technologies and goals -- Dave Crocker's email architecture document comes to mind.  But they don't do much to help focus on goals in the way that is  almost a prerequisite to a successful WG.

So, I suggest that in the interest of getting somewhere, we might think about the kind of goals suitable for WG creation.  Examples of such goals might be:

-- Making X portable across cloud vendors, where X might be virtual machines, storage grids, email archives, etc.

-- Enhancing security of cloud services by doing Y, where Y might be enhancements to authentication, specification of best practices, etc.  

-- Standardizing interface Z,  where Z might be video streaming, VPN extensions, etc.

I think there are enough goals here for a dozen WG's, but probably not enough people.  Is there a goal or two that enough of us share to give us critical mass?

For my part, I'm most enthused about the first category of goals -- standards to ensure that users aren't locked in to a single vendor.   What are other folks enthused about?  -- Nathaniel

clouds mailing list