Re: [clouds] __答复:_scope_of_the_cloud

Yes, in progress, and doing this. Plan to publish this soon (may wait a few
more days just to see whether we see any more new comments and/or
suggestions). Thanks.

2010/4/9 Gene Golovinsky <gene@alertlogic.com>

>   We're also missing a way of describing containers (e.g. hypervisors,
> platforms, etc.) and workloads (e.g. applications, virtual machines).
> CloudAudit provides a technical solution to the former (but it's out of
> scope) and Cisco's James Urquhart has been working on a descriptor format
> for the latter[2]. Both of these areas seem appropriate for IETF
> involvement, and indeed CloudAudit could be worked into a generic catalog
> service (e.g. the legal name of the provider, its location, logo, services,
> SLAs, etc.).
>
> *[Gene>] I fully agree with that*
>
>
>
> I think the best next step would be for to work torwards formalising the
> "clouds" effort somewhat, which will necessarily involve enumerating the
> opportunities for standards development and prioritising them. IETF-78 would
> presumably be a good forum for this activity (assuming it can't be done more
> inclusively on this mailing list).
>
> *[Gene>] In one of the previous e-mails to the list Bhumip has outlined
> areas of Cloud related interests. Then we had a discussion on the list where
> people expressed their preferences, suggestions and disagreements. Bhumip,
> since you were already doing this, would you please recap the list taking
> all that into account?*
>
> * *
>
> *Cheers.*
>
> *--Gene*
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> clouds mailing list
> clouds@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clouds
>
>

-- 
Best Regards.

Bhumip Khasnabish (Mobile:+001-781-752-8003, bhumip@acm.org)

© 2010 Bhumip Khasnabish. Do not view, print, forward, and save the content
of this email if you are not the intended recipient of the communiqué.