Re: [clouds] __答复:_scope_of_the_cloud

Bhumip Khasnabish <vumip1@gmail.com> Fri, 09 April 2010 12:16 UTC

Return-Path: <vumip1@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: clouds@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: clouds@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E3513A6882 for <clouds@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 05:16:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.245
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.245 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-2.002, BAYES_00=-2.599, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, SARE_SUB_ENC_GB2312=1.345]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id M4ZfUQzMtUCM for <clouds@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 05:16:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yx0-f179.google.com (mail-yx0-f179.google.com [209.85.210.179]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 530BF3A684A for <clouds@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 05:16:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yxe9 with SMTP id 9so1771145yxe.29 for <clouds@ietf.org>; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 05:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:received:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=vR/0zmRfYRldkdiBEEIDkBoKgmwHKgghaFSWUCyzL4Q=; b=I7K6oemyzNnxxYPCnNOyhf0Vj5xksTWuYK8AKDM5z5wFhGvmT865A71wJ/JbKg1yEa eyodHZYTmM/28vsOlYrfGEMoGRH/tCx7CZjI6Xzbwts1VIyicgFXU3Vh4OZVqUzraywW JcZkDAy4Gc2g63Z19yoOX65AMqfwN2LwoJhNU=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=VzezG2lFWfSJ6f0P3D/AsyNEIX09JUbPXo+hAQIrQfYnUHv11HaRiE+02HHVgLIKqA +0zFh/tFn6JUU+Y1qcEvSlsLijA19A04KT0quXFs+sHf2ckDWvkowRh9XzO1sPzUiKqG XFcYtfQZ31EL1xLFucrRsufSwBMosVmakvnwE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.231.8.147 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Apr 2010 05:16:06 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <C6A1D07CACFDBD4D9422C7D7ED288D410418B5B080@34093-MBX-C01.mex07a.mlsrvr.com>
References: <201004091421281408197@chinamobile.com> <OF97A02D2D.F12C57AA-ON48257700.0025B7E9-48257700.00267C69@zte.com.cn> <i2kda8464b11004090045scff74af9qd5a43fde4cc2df31@mail.gmail.com> <201004091607326563002@chinamobile.com> <w2o460b71b91004090146te13e3415y72f3d870b3de408b@mail.gmail.com> <C6A1D07CACFDBD4D9422C7D7ED288D410418B5B080@34093-MBX-C01.mex07a.mlsrvr.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 08:16:06 -0400
Received: by 10.100.246.13 with SMTP id t13mr2569571anh.208.1270815366845; Fri, 09 Apr 2010 05:16:06 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <t2wa065968d1004090516m6a7326e2xac25d6397ca55c38@mail.gmail.com>
From: Bhumip Khasnabish <vumip1@gmail.com>
To: Gene Golovinsky <gene@alertlogic.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e68deb5e84a0da0483ccc2b9
Cc: "clouds@ietf.org" <clouds@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [clouds] =?gb2312?b?X1+08Li0Ol9zY29wZV9vZl90aGVfY2xvdWQ=?=
X-BeenThere: clouds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Clouds pre-BOF discussion list <clouds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clouds>, <mailto:clouds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/clouds>
List-Post: <mailto:clouds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:clouds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clouds>, <mailto:clouds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2010 12:16:22 -0000

Yes, in progress, and doing this. Plan to publish this soon (may wait a few
more days just to see whether we see any more new comments and/or
suggestions). Thanks.

2010/4/9 Gene Golovinsky <gene@alertlogic.com>

>   We're also missing a way of describing containers (e.g. hypervisors,
> platforms, etc.) and workloads (e.g. applications, virtual machines).
> CloudAudit provides a technical solution to the former (but it's out of
> scope) and Cisco's James Urquhart has been working on a descriptor format
> for the latter[2]. Both of these areas seem appropriate for IETF
> involvement, and indeed CloudAudit could be worked into a generic catalog
> service (e.g. the legal name of the provider, its location, logo, services,
> SLAs, etc.).
>
> *[Gene>] I fully agree with that*
>
>
>
> I think the best next step would be for to work torwards formalising the
> "clouds" effort somewhat, which will necessarily involve enumerating the
> opportunities for standards development and prioritising them. IETF-78 would
> presumably be a good forum for this activity (assuming it can't be done more
> inclusively on this mailing list).
>
> *[Gene>] In one of the previous e-mails to the list Bhumip has outlined
> areas of Cloud related interests. Then we had a discussion on the list where
> people expressed their preferences, suggestions and disagreements. Bhumip,
> since you were already doing this, would you please recap the list taking
> all that into account?*
>
> * *
>
> *Cheers.*
>
> *--Gene*
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> clouds mailing list
> clouds@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clouds
>
>


-- 
Best Regards.

Bhumip Khasnabish (Mobile:+001-781-752-8003, bhumip@acm.org)

© 2010 Bhumip Khasnabish. Do not view, print, forward, and save the content
of this email if you are not the intended recipient of the communiqué.