Re: [clouds] IETF-78 Cloud Standards BOF

"Monique Morrow (mmorrow)" <mmorrow@cisco.com> Wed, 28 July 2010 12:35 UTC

Return-Path: <mmorrow@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: clouds@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: clouds@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1631528C0E8 for <clouds@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 05:35:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.475
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.475 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.123, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9PEo-8J+KKBD for <clouds@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 05:35:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com (rtp-iport-1.cisco.com [64.102.122.148]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22A6128C123 for <clouds@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 05:35:02 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: rtp-iport-1.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAJfAT0xAZnwM/2dsb2JhbACfbXGkfJsZgm+CRwSLLA
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.55,274,1278288000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="140205151"
Received: from rtp-core-1.cisco.com ([64.102.124.12]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 28 Jul 2010 12:35:23 +0000
Received: from xbh-ams-201.cisco.com (xbh-ams-201.cisco.com [144.254.75.7]) by rtp-core-1.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o6SCZN86027784; Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:35:23 GMT
Received: from xmb-ams-110.cisco.com ([144.254.74.85]) by xbh-ams-201.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:35:23 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CB2E51.58D6169A"
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:31:06 +0200
Message-ID: <317616CE96204D49B5A1811098BA8950027876F5@XMB-AMS-110.cisco.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [clouds] IETF-78 Cloud Standards BOF
Thread-Index: AcsuTL9mj8JJKN//Q4q9BVXc3kn9gAABABdy
References: <024501cb2e4c$c17f78e0$447e6aa0$@com>
From: "Monique Morrow (mmorrow)" <mmorrow@cisco.com>
To: "Chris Fenton (Iridescent)" <cfenton@iridescentnetworks.com>, <clouds@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Jul 2010 12:35:23.0250 (UTC) FILETIME=[591D1D20:01CB2E51]
Cc: k.mcewen@verizon.net
Subject: Re: [clouds] IETF-78 Cloud Standards BOF
X-BeenThere: clouds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Clouds pre-BOF discussion list <clouds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clouds>, <mailto:clouds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/clouds>
List-Post: <mailto:clouds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:clouds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clouds>, <mailto:clouds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2010 12:35:21 -0000

Chris

Do you proposed perhaps a framework draft as a starting point?

Monique





-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Fenton (Iridescent) [mailto:cfenton@iridescentnetworks.com]
Sent: Wed 7/28/2010 5:02 AM
To: clouds@ietf.org
Cc: k.mcewen@verizon.net
Subject: [clouds] IETF-78 Cloud Standards BOF
 
Hi all,

Thanks for interesting presentations.  To me the cloud without common or option for a standardised interface/api is not a cloud its a set of service platforms. We need to move forwards define the topic areas for standardisation but essentially its all the elements you have for subscribers to access a data platform from identity thru transport. Then there are the service management aspects and the service provider capabilities who want logs session or usage records and finally the platform owner would need some or at least be able to support the above....

So possible topic areas for definition are :

Service user 
- access 
- transport
- service discovery maybe

Service provider
- Service management (also VM management - movement etc...)
- Subscription management
- charging billing etc...
- basically these are all FCAPS aspects Fault, Configuration, Accounting, Performance, Security

Platform provider - not so sure what standards apply so long as the platform itself provides the APis the boxes can be anything 
- Management 
- also FCAPS

CJ

Mr Chris Fenton
+44 7802 221 541
cfenton@iridescentnetworks.com
Skype: chrisfentouk
http://www.iridescentnetworks.com