Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big
"Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com> Sun, 11 April 2010 09:54 UTC
Return-Path: <dromasca@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: clouds@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: clouds@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E2DF3A689D for <clouds@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 02:54:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.925
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.925 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.184, BAYES_05=-1.11, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AtLxU3cumMIB for <clouds@core3.amsl.com>; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 02:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com (de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.71.100]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 907383A684C for <clouds@ietf.org>; Sun, 11 Apr 2010 02:54:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.52,184,1270440000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="183802823"
Received: from unknown (HELO p-us1-erheast.us1.avaya.com) ([135.11.50.53]) by de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 11 Apr 2010 05:54:28 -0400
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.52,184,1270440000"; d="scan'208,217"; a="450534975"
Received: from unknown (HELO 307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com) ([135.64.140.15]) by p-us1-erheast-out.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP; 11 Apr 2010 05:54:26 -0400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CAD95C.EC1F1825"
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 11:54:05 +0200
Message-ID: <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A04020C1E55@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <4BBE2973.2080003@oracle.com>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big
Thread-Index: AcrXTw/qltfNHLHYT6+E79XtAy/IswCDUPDw
References: <C6A1D07CACFDBD4D9422C7D7ED288D41041896117A@34093-MBX-C01.mex07a.mlsrvr.com> <4BBC9B0C.5050207@stpeter.im> <C6A1D07CACFDBD4D9422C7D7ED288D41041896119B@34093-MBX-C01.mex07a.mlsrvr.com> <D7AB7C87-E8F6-496B-9D37-E13FAED746F2@cisco.com> <008001cad669$a4d0add0$440c7c0a@china.huawei.com> <010401cad673$9e2ca6f0$da85f4d0$@org> <00d001cad676$0be2fa30$440c7c0a@china.huawei.com> <C6A1D07CACFDBD4D9422C7D7ED288D4104189615B3@34093-MBX-C01.mex07a.mlsrvr.com> <008201cad72f$2e502700$440c7c0a@china.huawei.com> <u2xa065968d1004080907v9fa013c5z2c68474684c34617@mail.gmail.com> <8FA8FF27-FB6D-42EF-A056-6D631D4A2F04@arsc.edu> <4BBE2973.2080003@oracle.com>
From: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan)" <dromasca@avaya.com>
To: Mark Carlson <mark.carlson@oracle.com>, Melinda Shore <shore@arsc.edu>
Cc: clouds@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big
X-BeenThere: clouds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Clouds pre-BOF discussion list <clouds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clouds>, <mailto:clouds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/clouds>
List-Post: <mailto:clouds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:clouds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clouds>, <mailto:clouds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2010 09:54:36 -0000
Mark, As a matter of clarification (which I repeatedly made in our conference calls) - I am not 'representing' the IETF in any formal manner in this activity. I am participating as an individual contributor. Of course, as an IETF participant I am sharing information related to the IETF activities that I am aware about. Dan ________________________________ From: Mark Carlson [mailto:mark.carlson@oracle.com] Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 10:08 PM To: Melinda Shore Cc: Bhumip Khasnabish; clouds@ietf.org; Romascanu, Dan (Dan) Subject: Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Agreed. If you want a good place to start, go to: http://cloud-standards.org We are already coordinating cloud work from the various SDOs there, and IETF is represented by Dan Romascanu <http://www.ietf.org/iesg/bio/dan-romascanu.html> . -- mark On 4/8/10 12:50 PM, Melinda Shore wrote: On Apr 8, 2010, at 8:07 AM, Bhumip Khasnabish wrote: of course there are and will be many workitems within the theme of cloud-based systems, services, inter-cloud system, and so on. Cloud-based storage, cloud-based mobile-data backup service, cloud-based network service in order to maintain service continuity, disaster-tolerant communications, etc. are a few examples. Can we keep the discussion in the same group please. Thanks a lot. I think it might be worthwhile for people who are fishing for work to do to sit down and take a look at the charters for some established working groups, with a particular eye to how the work is scoped, how the deliverables are defined, and so on. I think it's kind of weird that people want to work on something but they aren't sure what - usually it's an idea or ideas that drive work, or at least some problem that's got at least some wee little bit of definition - but as long as people seem intent on taking this approach it might help to have some sense of what this flailing about ought to produce. Work in the IETF is much more narrowly-focused and precisely-scoped than is the norm in other standards bodies and/or industry consortia. Melinda _______________________________________________ clouds mailing list clouds@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clouds
- [clouds] Use cases Gene Golovinsky
- Re: [clouds] Use cases Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [clouds] Use cases Gene Golovinsky
- Re: [clouds] Use cases Mark Webb
- Re: [clouds] Use cases Gene Golovinsky
- [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Linda Dunbar
- Re: [clouds] Use cases Mark Webb
- Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Carl Williams
- Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Linda Dunbar
- Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Melinda Shore
- [clouds] 答复: Re: Use cases meng.yu
- Re: [clouds] Use cases Bhumip Khasnabish
- Re: [clouds] Use cases Masum Hasan (masum)
- Re: [clouds] Use cases Bhumip Khasnabish
- Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Gene Golovinsky
- Re: [clouds] Use cases Gene Golovinsky
- Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Mark Webb
- Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Gene Golovinsky
- Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Sam Johnston
- Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Sam Johnston
- Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Linda Dunbar
- Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Bhumip Khasnabish
- Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big So, Ning
- Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Linda Dunbar
- Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Masum Hasan (masum)
- Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Masum Hasan (masum)
- Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Mark Carlson
- Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Melinda Shore
- Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Mark Carlson
- Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Gene Golovinsky
- Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Mark Webb
- Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Stephen Fleece
- Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Linda Dunbar
- Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Sam Johnston
- Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Mark Carlson
- [clouds] (no subject) zhangyunfei
- [clouds] (no subject) zhangyunfei
- Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Monique Morrow (mmorrow)
- Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Ning Zong
- Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Sun Shaoling
- Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Bhumip Khasnabish
- Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Bhumip Khasnabish
- Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Bhumip Khasnabish
- Re: [clouds] Scope of the Cloud is too big Romascanu, Dan (Dan)