Re: [clouds] Announcing Clouds bar BoF during IETF-77 (March, 2010, Anaheim, CA)

Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com> Tue, 23 February 2010 00:37 UTC

Return-Path: <scott.brim@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: clouds@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: clouds@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02BF028C4A5; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:37:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.539
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.539 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.060, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kigXdbD++hwb; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:37:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from qw-out-2122.google.com (qw-out-2122.google.com [74.125.92.24]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0327328C44A; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:37:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by qw-out-2122.google.com with SMTP id 9so742356qwb.31 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:39:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=VlrkpOgCRSHQCcM/VCIJStWe9dyVA8ECEkFbQDBH+9g=; b=bNsyTlc30H/fay6PSWof/iPCkeSi+DOvaMuCLg3Lg7p/ZMSnzE6DhL1WGP+N2s0AFN 8R/Wsf8U4MHd9WTy9dq51+FjJgucFdLvkZhrCHIQZZZ+2wfBTbEaQ6+EkZ8s/nKb5uGp gWifdoIUs2O0FH2RIaluBhhMxhQy4XKbx7l38=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=eBg4okiWgNt/tyWNSk3PdgX9K1lotYpeRbCyg1seUCJy3AQhtf52GIWHqUBZk8jvkd ZhjhLMPwjmU4ab/12Pfs0Zqo9r3dOeTCaaiexq8t6jQOdL4qsw96feuY6LYp3EEmDykB rgBBKAwggM1QCGs4rzLZIZ8ER+wpX1YH5GAik=
Received: by 10.224.82.140 with SMTP id b12mr6471983qal.48.1266885590211; Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:39:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbrim-mbp.local (198-135-0-233.cisco.com [198.135.0.233]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm11534313qwd.16.2010.02.22.16.39.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 22 Feb 2010 16:39:48 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4B8323D1.8000601@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:39:45 -0500
From: Scott Brim <scott.brim@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100111 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
References: <a065968d1002202233r7dba945axefdc9696f0ee8434@mail.gmail.com> <EDC652A26FB23C4EB6384A4584434A0401F8C033@307622ANEX5.global.avaya.com> <20339.1266862031@marajade.sandelman.ca> <4B82EE8B.5030001@gmail.com> <FD7321FD-7ECE-46F5-8746-8B209A892610@arsc.edu> <4B82F256.5010807@dcrocker.net> <Pine.GSO.4.63.1002221311140.26562@pita.cisco.com> <4B830129.6000303@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B830129.6000303@gmail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:15:40 -0800
Cc: clouds@ietf.org, Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>, dcrocker@bbiw.net, David Chadwick <d.w.chadwick@kent.ac.uk>, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [clouds] Announcing Clouds bar BoF during IETF-77 (March, 2010, Anaheim, CA)
X-BeenThere: clouds@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Clouds pre-BOF discussion list <clouds.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clouds>, <mailto:clouds-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/clouds>
List-Post: <mailto:clouds@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:clouds-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clouds>, <mailto:clouds-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:37:55 -0000

Brian E Carpenter allegedly wrote on 02/22/2010 17:11 EST:
> Well yes, everybody's right in this area, since the terminology
> is so fuzzy and so infected by marketing noise. In any case, I am
> not for a moment saying: don't hold a Bar BOF. It seems like an
> excellent idea to talk about it. What I am saying is: our sister
> standards body the OGF seems like the natural home for this
> topic, and we have to be very precise in defining scope to avoid
> overlap and confusion.
> 
> Regards
>    Brian

If you're proposing OGF you should look at the 6 or 7 other SDOs doing
useful work on clouds, e.g. the DMTF.  It's a complex situation.