Re: [clue] WGLC on draft-ietf-clue-signaling-10 - my review

Roni Even <roni.even@huawei.com> Tue, 07 March 2017 05:48 UTC

Return-Path: <roni.even@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: clue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: clue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A99CE1294F6 for <clue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 21:48:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_KAM_HTML_FONT_INVALID=0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oauHjsaSVpuQ for <clue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 21:48:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D3491294B7 for <clue@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 21:48:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO LHREML713-CAH.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DIK75938; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 05:48:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DGGEMM402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.20.210) by LHREML713-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.36) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 05:48:51 +0000
Received: from DGGEMM506-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.4.77]) by DGGEMM402-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.3.20.210]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 13:48:41 +0800
From: Roni Even <roni.even@huawei.com>
To: Robert Hansen <rohanse2@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [clue] WGLC on draft-ietf-clue-signaling-10 - my review
Thread-Index: AQHSbMJUWJIwjQhp9EmgUfnC3hMoFKGJMyJQ
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 05:48:41 +0000
Message-ID: <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD78DEFF@DGGEMM506-MBS.china.huawei.com>
References: <6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD76C7C2@DGGEMM506-MBX.china.huawei.com> <876a2955-7201-13a9-1847-621083b99198@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <876a2955-7201-13a9-1847-621083b99198@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.200.201.224]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_6E58094ECC8D8344914996DAD28F1CCD78DEFFDGGEMM506MBSchina_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020201.58BE49C4.0284, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.4.77, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: efca134066a34e40f6c91ddbf48406fe
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/clue/S69CNrQwiPH6owO0CF_Yk8Zv8hg>
Cc: "clue@ietf.org" <clue@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [clue] WGLC on draft-ietf-clue-signaling-10 - my review
X-BeenThere: clue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: CLUE - ControLling mUltiple streams for TElepresence <clue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/clue>, <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/clue/>
List-Post: <mailto:clue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clue>, <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 05:48:57 -0000

Hi Rob,
Can you update the document so that I can send it to publication
Regards
Roni

From: clue [mailto:clue-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Robert Hansen
Sent: יום ה 12 ינואר 2017 12:55
To: clue@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [clue] WGLC on draft-ietf-clue-signaling-10 - my review


Thanks for the review Roni, will incorporate the comments into the next version.
Rob
On 12/01/17 10:50, Roni Even wrote:
Hi,
As individual, I reviewed the document some comments


1.       The idnits shows error, please address idnits issues

2.       In the introduction first paragraph suggest reference for SDP

3.       In section 3 “The "sip.clue" media feature tag indicates support for CLUE” add “in SIP[RFC3261] calls”

4.       In section 4.1 second paragraph “A device MUST NOT include more than one CLUE group in its SDP” add “SDP offer[RFC3264]”

5.       In section 4.2 first paragraph “must” to “MUST”

6.       In section 4.2 first paragraph “a CLUE group in the SDP” add “SDP offer”

7.       In section 6.1 last part what is the difference between the first and the fourth bullet?

8.       In section 8 last SDP example for “m=video 0 RTP/AVP 96” add a line with “a=mid:6” this is relevant to the group usage. I was also  wondering if we remove mid 6 from the CLUE group?

9.       In section 9 in the drawing need Alice and Bob instead of EP1 and EP2

10.   In section 13 add a note to the RFC editor to remove this section

Thanks
Roni Even
As individual



From: clue [mailto:clue-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Roni Even
Sent: יום ה 12 ינואר 2017 08:29
To: clue@ietf.org<mailto:clue@ietf.org>
Subject: [clue] WGLC on draft-ietf-clue-signaling-10


Hi,
We had a WGLC on draft-ietf-clue-signaling-06 on October 2015.  Since then there were updates to the documents based on the reviews and the documents should be ready now for publication.

I would like to have a second WGLC allowing the WG to review the document before  sending it to publication.
The WGLC will end February 2nd  to allow for enough time for reviews.

Please use this time and review the document and send comments to the list including “I read and have no comments”

Thanks
Roni Even
CLUE WG co-chair








_______________________________________________

clue mailing list

clue@ietf.org<mailto:clue@ietf.org>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clue