Re: [clue] Publishing CLUE protocol as Experimental?

Simon Pietro Romano <spromano@unina.it> Sat, 22 December 2018 10:06 UTC

Return-Path: <spromano@unina.it>
X-Original-To: clue@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: clue@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8168F13104D for <clue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Dec 2018 02:06:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hV22JD-FN9_K for <clue@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Dec 2018 02:06:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unina.it (fmvip.unina.it [IPv6:2001:760:3403:ffff::7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6D2512D4E9 for <clue@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Dec 2018 02:06:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp2.unina.it (smtp2.unina.it [192.132.34.62]) by leas1.unina.it with ESMTP id wBMA6pVw019278-wBMA6pW0019278 (version=TLSv1.0 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 22 Dec 2018 11:06:51 +0100
Received: from [192.168.1.86] (93-44-35-252.ip95.fastwebnet.it [93.44.35.252]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp2.unina.it (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id wBMA6nGC012012 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 22 Dec 2018 11:06:50 +0100
From: Simon Pietro Romano <spromano@unina.it>
Message-Id: <62794BF0-F1A8-4F18-BCB4-110CCF2E9D57@unina.it>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_14189380-CAF8-46A5-9917-BAEBCE3E8365"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.2 \(3445.102.3\))
Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 11:06:49 +0100
In-Reply-To: <371a0f51-3919-8ae2-c782-e51ce4fc6e2f@nostrum.com>
Cc: "clue@ietf.org" <clue@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-clue-protocol.all@tools.ietf.org, Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>, Roberta Presta <roberta.presta@unina.it>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
References: <371a0f51-3919-8ae2-c782-e51ce4fc6e2f@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.102.3)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/clue/l-S_4He2CxpvtorcHAEzo0VbApQ>
Subject: Re: [clue] Publishing CLUE protocol as Experimental?
X-BeenThere: clue@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: CLUE - ControLling mUltiple streams for TElepresence <clue.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/clue>, <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/clue/>
List-Post: <mailto:clue@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/clue>, <mailto:clue-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2018 10:06:59 -0000

Hello everybody,

I’m perfectly fine with Benjamin’s and Ben’s proposal.

Cheers,

Simon

                     				            _\\|//_
                           				   ( O-O )
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o00~~(_)~~00o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                    				Simon Pietro Romano
             				 Universita' di Napoli Federico II
                		     Computer Engineering Department
	             Phone: +39 081 7683823 -- Fax: +39 081 7683816
                                           e-mail: spromano@unina.it

		    <<Molti mi dicono che lo scoraggiamento è l'alibi degli
		    idioti. Ci rifletto un istante; e mi scoraggio>>. Magritte.
               			                     oooO
       ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(   )~~~ Oooo~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
					                 \ (            (   )
			                                  \_)          ) /
                                                                       (_/



> Il giorno 22 dic 2018, alle ore 00:10, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> ha scritto:
> 
> CLUE working group and document authors:
> 
> During IESG evaluation, Benjamin and Ben raised some issues around the state machine design, timeouts, and interaction with the various SIP state machines. While these could probably be addressed by adding substantial new text and a handful of new states and supervisory timers to the CLUE state machines, as well as including additional detail about the interaction between such state machines and the SIP state machines, it's not clear to me that the CLUE working group has the kind of energy necessary for that kind of refinement at this point in its lifecycle.
> 
> An alternate path that both Ben and Benjamin would be okay with is publication of the protocol mechanism as Experimental rather than Standards Track, in order to allow the collection of operational experience around implementing and deploying the protocol with the state machines as specified. This would be sufficient to satisfy their concerns around the currently-defined state machine and would allow publication of the CLUE documents. (Note that, due to the relationship between clue-protocol, clue-signaling, and clue-datachannel, this would also result in the publication of clue-signaling and clue-datachannel as experimental.)
> 
> Recognizing that many people are out of the office during this time of year, I'd like to ask that anyone who has comments regarding the proposal to move the core CLUE documents to Experimental status respond before Friday, January 18th. Thanks.
> 
> /a
> 
>