IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: One last nit

Steve Coya <scoya@CNRI.Reston.VA.US> Fri, 17 March 1995 16:54 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04472; 17 Mar 95 11:54 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04468; 17 Mar 95 11:54 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10695; 17 Mar 95 11:54 EST
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04459; 17 Mar 95 11:54 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04455; 17 Mar 95 11:54 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10690; 17 Mar 95 11:54 EST
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa04448; 17 Mar 95 11:54 EST
To: Claudio Topolcic <topolcic@bbn.com>
cc: iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: One last nit
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 16 Mar 95 09:59:23 EST." <199503161459.JAA05866@peregrine.bbn.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 1995 11:54:30 -0500
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Steve Coya <scoya@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Message-ID: <9503171154.aa04448@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US>

>> But I must agree. If we are to follow procedures, then we
>> should follow them.

This may be (is?) a pre-requisite for obtaining liability insurance for
the IESG; that we have a defined process, AND that we abide by it.

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status