Re: IP Security......

Mike O'Dell <mo@uunet.uu.net> Wed, 15 March 1995 16:33 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05948; 15 Mar 95 11:33 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05944; 15 Mar 95 11:33 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10753; 15 Mar 95 11:33 EST
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05931; 15 Mar 95 11:33 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05927; 15 Mar 95 11:33 EST
Received: from rodan.UU.NET by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa10732; 15 Mar 95 11:33 EST
Received: by rodan.UU.NET id QQyheo20819; Wed, 15 Mar 1995 11:34:03 -0500
Message-Id: <QQyheo20819.199503151634@rodan.UU.NET>
To: "Jeffrey I. Schiller" <jis@mit.edu>
cc: iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US, mo@uunet.uu.net
Subject: Re: IP Security......
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 15 Mar 1995 10:44:12 EST." <ab8cbaaa01021004720f@[18.74.3.75]>
Date: Wed, 15 Mar 1995 11:34:02 -0500
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Mike O'Dell <mo@uunet.uu.net>

Jeff,

I hope it's clear that I'm not shooting at you per se.
If it appears that way, let me correct that now.

I started thinking about "security" and ended up musing
in much larger terms.  maybe SSL isn't a slam-dunk and will
either get de-railed or turn into a real Internet Standard
one way or another.  the larger question still stands independent
of the resolution of any particular knotty issue.

	-mo