Re: insurance information

Steve Coya <scoya@CNRI.Reston.VA.US> Fri, 31 March 1995 16:02 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05472; 31 Mar 95 11:02 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05468; 31 Mar 95 11:02 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07373; 31 Mar 95 11:02 EST
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05461; 31 Mar 95 11:02 EST
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa05455; 31 Mar 95 11:02 EST
To: Mike O'Dell <mo@uunet.uu.net>
cc: iesg@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: insurance information
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 30 Mar 95 20:21:16 EST." <QQyjjh29459.199503310121@rodan.UU.NET>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 95 11:02:03 -0500
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Steve Coya <scoya@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Message-ID: <9503311102.aa05455@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US>

Mike,

>>  I doubt very seriously if the language quoted covers the IESG at all.

Scott reported that the ISOC insurance policy had been amened to
specifically include (name) the IESG and IAB. My point/question,
though, pertained to the IESG's role in setting standards.

If all the amendment does is add the IESG to ISOC's policy, that may
not be sufficient to cover IESG standards actions activity. The ISOC
doesn't set standards, so it MAY be that there is no insurance for this
activity.


Steve