IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: One last nit

John C Klensin <klensin@mail1.reston.mci.net> Fri, 17 March 1995 21:14 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08856; 17 Mar 95 16:14 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08851; 17 Mar 95 16:14 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16649; 17 Mar 95 16:14 EST
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08843; 17 Mar 95 16:14 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa08836; 17 Mar 95 16:14 EST
Received: from mail1.Reston.mci.net by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa16644; 17 Mar 95 16:14 EST
Received: from jck.reston.mci.net (jck2.Reston.mci.net) by MAIL1.RESTON.MCI.NET (PMDF V4.3-10 #8388) id <01HO8YOHEOTS000BP5@MAIL1.RESTON.MCI.NET>; Fri, 17 Mar 1995 16:15:18 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 17 Mar 1995 16:14:40 -0500
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: John C Klensin <klensin@mail1.reston.mci.net>
Subject: Re: One last nit
X-Sender: klensin@mail1.reston.mci.net (Unverified)
To: Steve Coya <scoya@CNRI.Reston.VA.US>
Cc: iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Message-id: <01HO8YOHGWW2000BP5@MAIL1.RESTON.MCI.NET>
X-Envelope-to: iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US, scoya@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Windows Eudora Version 2.0.3
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

>ONCRPC is still an active WG. The chair did actually submit the two
>I-Ds for consideration as Proposed Standards to the IESG, but the AD
>said this would not happen until the agreement had been reached.
>
>I will also note that an AD (or the IESG) can, AT ANY TIME, decide that
>an extended Last Call period be invoked. I believe this was done for
>the IPNG recommendation.

Guess I just hadn't heard from them lately.   I'd argue for "back to
normal", i.e., the relevant AD should stand up and tell us what should be
done with this.

   john

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status