IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IP Security......

Mike O'Dell <mo@uunet.uu.net> Mon, 20 March 1995 03:37 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07659; 19 Mar 95 22:37 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07655; 19 Mar 95 22:37 EST
Received: from ietf.cnri.reston.va.us by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14868; 19 Mar 95 22:37 EST
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07648; 19 Mar 95 22:37 EST
Received: from CNRI.Reston.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa07644; 19 Mar 95 22:37 EST
Received: from rodan.UU.NET by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa14863; 19 Mar 95 22:37 EST
Received: by rodan.UU.NET id QQyhva22852; Sun, 19 Mar 1995 22:37:49 -0500
Message-Id: <QQyhva22852.199503200337@rodan.UU.NET>
To: pvm@isi.edu
cc: iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Subject: Re: IP Security......
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 19 Mar 1995 19:26:19 PST." <199503200327.AA20678@zephyr.isi.edu>
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 1995 22:37:49 -0500
X-Orig-Sender: iesg-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Mike O'Dell <mo@uunet.uu.net>

do we have to publish an informational when we know there
is IETF working group activity and it is clearly an end run?

if they take it to the WG and get rebuffed somehow and *then*
want to publish an informational, then I'd lead the choir,
but to do so ab initio without trying the WG path....

at least we could *suggest* they take it to the working group????

	-mo

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email