Re: Comments anyone

Allison Mankin <mankin@isi.edu> Tue, 28 March 1995 03:52 UTC

Message-Id: <199503280351.AA11357@zephyr.isi.edu>
To: Christian Huitema <huitema@sophia.inria.fr>
Reply-To: mankin@isi.edu
Subject: Re: Comments anyone
Cc: pvm@isi.edu, crocker@cybercash.com, postel@isi.edu, iesg@CNRI.Reston.VA.US
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 1995 19:51:15 -0800
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Allison Mankin <mankin@isi.edu>

In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 28 Mar 1995 05:39:43 +0200.
             <199503280339.FAA14594@pax.inria.fr> 
--------
Christian,

> Mixed feelings. Mentioning review sort of reinforce the "standard status";
> mentioning the "status of this memo" section, i.e. the result of the
> review, might be more useful.

I see your point and I think that emphasizing the status
of the memo section would accomplish what was needed.
Perhaps you can say that this section sometimes contains
a pointer from the IESG about the relationship of the
text to standards track work?

Thanks,

Allison

Re: Comments anyone Paul Mockapetris
Re: Comments anyone Allison Mankin
Re: Comments anyone Christian Huitema
Re: Comments anyone Allison Mankin