Re: One last nit

[Steve Coya <[e-mail]>]

John,

>> the reason why we distinguish between two-week and four-week last
>> calls is that the latter permits members of the community who are
>> interested in the work, but surprised, to come up to speed... while we
>> presume that the existence of an active WG (note "active") acts as
>> sufficient "you better be up to speed, something may emerge" notice
>> that we can use a shorter period.

ONCRPC is still an active WG. The chair did actually submit the two
I-Ds for consideration as Proposed Standards to the IESG, but the AD
said this would not happen until the agreement had been reached.

I will also note that an AD (or the IESG) can, AT ANY TIME, decide that
an extended Last Call period be invoked. I believe this was done for
the IPNG recommendation.


Steve